Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Parmy
Maybe he will give everyone at the VA an orange beret.

However, he was right about Rumsfeld's estimate of troops needed in Iraq being way too low.

7 posted on 12/06/2008 3:57:37 PM PST by KarlInOhio (11/4: The revolutionary socialists beat the Fabian ones. Where can we find a capitalist party?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

Didn’t he want 400,000 to 500,000 troops in Iraq.

And where did he think we were going to get that number?


12 posted on 12/06/2008 4:02:32 PM PST by Carley (Prayers for Sgt. Eddie Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: KarlInOhio

not really (RE Rumsfeld). This general said it would take 400,000+ troops. We are winning with less than half of that.


52 posted on 12/06/2008 6:13:04 PM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: KarlInOhio
However, he was right about Rumsfeld's estimate of troops needed in Iraq being way too low.

He war only partly right by dumb luck.

The surge called for an additional 30,000 troops for a total of about 140,000 ....

Gen Shineski claimed we would need 300,000 troops or more ...

It was intelligence that enabled us to eventually win, not strength in numbers.

Tribal leaders at first were more scared of the crazy jihadists than US troops.

Once we turned the tribal leaders, and it took several years (which is where Rummy was wrong).. we essentially won the war fairly quickly.

54 posted on 12/06/2008 6:35:00 PM PST by Edit35 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson