With your experience, why do you think that the Director of the Health Department issued the statement that she did issue which led the media to conclude that without revealing the exact contents of what was on the “vault copy” certificate, that it was indeed on file and in accordance with Hawaii statutes?
Do you think that it might be against the law in Hawaii to post a forged Certificate of Live Birth on the internet containing the name of the Registrar of Vital Statistics?
I’m betting that it might be.
I have no experience beyond any other average citizen’s with governmental administrative procedures. I work as a college professor.
I already answered that. That is the only way she could answer the question by law.Here again is what she said :
Fukino said she has “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.
It would have be ok for her to say they have his original Hawaiian birth certificate on record, because that would not be revealing anything in the record. It is telling that she didn't say that. If she had mentioned anything else, it would have been violating the law by revealing the contents of his record ( a foreign BC is submitted as part of the record when applying for a Certificate of Birth ). As far as how the media interprets things, she can't be held responsible for that.
Do you think that it might be against the law in Hawaii to post a forged Certificate of Live Birth on the internet containing the name of the Registrar of Vital Statistics?
TOTALLY. That is what this whole controversy is about. It was not the State of Hawaii that posted the image of the COLB. It was the Obama campaign.