You're going to have to post the exact "twisting". Stating that I "twisted" something without proof doesn't cut it.
All that you explained is your own personal interpretation of it.
The Scripture in question is more than clear. There is no "interpretation" required. It's so simple a toddler could understand it.
Accusing someone of "twisting" Scripture by means of "personal interpretation" is nothing more than a person's attempt to exempt themselves in their own minds from being accountable to the God Who wrote the Scripture by claiming that none of it is really true because it's only somebody's "personal interpretation".
That dog is never going to hunt. Your denial of the Scripture does not cancel out the fact that God will hold you and every other human being who has ever existed or who will ever exist in the future accountable based on what truth we have access to and what we did with that truth.
Denial does not mean escape.
I have done so.
The Scripture in question is more than clear. There is no "interpretation" required.
What it says is what it says. What YOU claim it says is interpretation.
Accusing someone of "twisting" Scripture by means of "personal interpretation" is nothing more than a person's attempt to exempt themselves in their own minds from being accountable to the God Who wrote the Scripture...
You are not God and I am exempt from accountability to you. I am accountable to the God Who wrote the Scripture, but I am not accountable to the human who wrote the interpretation.
In this case you are wrong. By denying your own personal interpretation of Scripture I escape your attempt to bind me to it.