To: BMiles2112
Your dishonesty is showing. I have not made a single reference to embryos once in this exchange. I asked you directly if you would be justified in killing an innocent to ensure your ability to procreate and you said, emphatically, YES. In addition, you stated in Post #95 that frozen embryos degenerate over time. If they do, then perpetuity is not possible. Plus that other bummer that humans will not exist forever, so the whole point of freezing embryos in perpetuity is moot anyway, but you knew that. Aw, what was I looking for again... oh yea, "YAWN!!!"
Those arguments were regarding the comparison between the terminally ill, in vegetative states, being hooked up to life-support machines and frozen embryos. Both are more or less in the same predicament.
To: MyTwoCopperCoins
...Both are more or less in the same predicament...LOL
272 posted on
12/12/2008 11:14:21 AM PST by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
To: MyTwoCopperCoins
Those arguments were regarding the comparison between the terminally ill, in vegetative states, being hooked up to life-support machines and frozen embryos.
None of which were my arguments, so I was wondering why your post was directed at me. Either an oops, or an intentional confusion of our discussion.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson