Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MyTwoCopperCoins; Petronski
>>Get real, you knew very well what I implied by that word, but delibrately choose to fight over semantics, instead of the essence of what I was trying to say. Please, you are better than that<<

This is a liberal way of debate. Frame the debate with a false fact and then demand that everyone else accept your fact as true.

Humans have NO instincts. Including the instinct to reproduce. If it were an instinct, half of Europe wouldn't be looking at filling their population voids with Muslims.

So your entire argument is a moot point.

300 posted on 12/12/2008 11:56:50 AM PST by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]


To: netmilsmom
Humans have NO instincts.

From your own post earlier, prior to that conference that defined what 'instinct' must mean, there was a list of 4000 human instincts. Suddenly, in a short span, they got reduced to none. Maybe instinct isn't the right word, but the meaning is something close. Like how babies, when immersed water, "instinctually" manage to cease breathing the water in. Haven't heard of that? Here, have a look:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFKt3KRqg5s&feature=related

You are so pitiful; you seek to confront, rather than make solid arguments. Sad. And immature.

302 posted on 12/12/2008 12:03:02 PM PST by MyTwoCopperCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson