[thefrankbaum]

I think the genes should be extinct because nature thinks they should be extinct. Not eugenics - nothing could be more natural. 100 years ago, those genes would cease.

What is your rationale? Because science can do something, we should?

[Citizen Blade]

I think the genes should be extinct because nature thinks they should be extinct. Not eugenics - nothing could be more natural. 100 years ago, those genes would cease.

100 years ago, a case of appendicitis had a good chance of killing you. 100 years ago, children born a couple of months prematurely were as good as dead.

The fact that, in the past, we were not able to cure or treat certain illnesses and disorders isn't an argument for stopping the advance of medical technology.

What is your rationale? Because science can do something, we should?

If science can improve the human condition, then yes.