[KellyM37]

SCOTUS knows, they are afraid, end of story.

[MrB]

Methinks they need a few

“open letters”

and

op-eds

pointing out their cowardliness for not addressing the issue and putting it to rest.

[JulienBenda]

Yep, end of story, for now. I wonder if any enterprising journaliste could undertake to dig up the facts in subsequent years, and make the “scoop of the decade”. I’m not gonna hold my breath.

[kauaiboy]

I heard an analysis on this which is likely true

The congress and SCOTUS do NOT want ALL the major cities in the United States to have riots which would DWARF the Rodney King riots , by Obambi being denied taking the oath by WHITE folks.

NOTHING, absoultely NOTHING, will prevent his taking the oath on the 20th of January

Now, mod you, this will NOT make these issues (the BC, Blago gate, Rezko etc) go away

I think I have to agree with this point of view

Now mind you, this is NOT a racist commentary

It would not only be the blacks who would riot but many many of the far left marxist radicals, who are just waiting for any reason to riot and create anarchy

[stuartcr]

What is it that the SCOTUS knows and is afraid of?

[holden]

I think the pro-review justices know they'd lose on this case because of Justice Kennedy voting with the Leftists (whose minds, I'm sure they've been apprised, are already "made up", hence this would be a useless exercise, unless one likes disclosing he's losing).

I think the pro-review justices do have a plan to navigate these waters and uphold the Constitution, as they swore, but it's not easy.

When considering the sadness or outrage one might feel about the justices regarding this case, it might be helpful to direct one's concerns toward those who resist being guided by the Constitution, that is, abrogate their oath, using the lame excuse that the Constitution was intended to be "living", "breathing", or that it should be guided by principles embodied in foreign viewpoints.

HF