Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin Has Become Media Obsession
Washington Observer-Reporter.com ^ | 12/16/2008 3:31 AM

Posted on 12/16/2008 11:15:22 AM PST by lewisglad

We can't understand why, six weeks after the election, it's still open season on Palin in the media. The latest "big story" came Sunday when John McCain appeared on ABC's "This Week" with George Stephanopoulos and was asked if Palin could count on his support if she ran for president in 2012.

McCain quite sensibly refused to commit himself to endorsing anyone in an election that's four years away, saying only that there are a number of young Republican governors who are ready to move into national leadership positions.

That got headlines that read in effect, "McCain refuses to endorse Palin," and prompted talking heads to comment that he apparently had changed his mind about Palin's qualification for office.

Of course that's not what he said. And Stephanopoulos' question wasn't about that - it was about trying to pin McCain down on whether he would support Palin for the nomination in 2012.

For some reason, Palin was met with almost instant dislike after McCain named her as his running mate. We can't recall another political figure who drew that kind of reaction so quickly.

Reporters descended on her church and searched through her children's birth records and even the records of a friend's divorce hoping to find something to turn into a scandal.

Honest critics of Palin, though, should admit that Palin is anything but dumb, and it's impossible to predict the future.

Suppose she ends up taking Ted Stevens' Senate seat and spends the next four or eight years working on legislation and dealing with national and international issues.

In that event, the Sarah Palin who emerged in 2012 or 2016 would be a quite different candidate from the one we met this fall.

Would we change our minds and endorse her? We couldn't say at this point, and it would be a silly question - as silly as the one Stephanopoulos asked McCain on Sunday. Seriously, with all the problems that the country is facing, can't we get over this obsession with Palin?


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: palin; pds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 12/16/2008 11:15:22 AM PST by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Speculation for 2012...

Sufficient for the day is the evil of it.


2 posted on 12/16/2008 11:18:39 AM PST by nominal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad; eaglesnest1

Sells papers. You betcha.

And the cobra is fascinated by the mongoose.

Guardian angels, stay alert.


3 posted on 12/16/2008 11:19:05 AM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

The reaction to Palin was sheer hysteria, literally so because radical feminists propelled it.


4 posted on 12/16/2008 11:19:16 AM PST by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

I fully expect McCain will endorse Obama in 2012.


5 posted on 12/16/2008 11:19:16 AM PST by MahatmaGandu (Remember, remember, the twenty-sixth of November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MahatmaGandu

Unless Obama disses him along the way. It’s all about John, you know.


6 posted on 12/16/2008 11:20:08 AM PST by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

7 posted on 12/16/2008 11:22:17 AM PST by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

“For some reason, Palin was met with almost instant dislike after McCain named her as his running mate.”

Simple. Palin was seen as severe threat to Obamachev’s election. She had to be destroyed. Obama showed the way by calling her a pig.

She can come back. She’ll have to be tough though.


8 posted on 12/16/2008 11:23:26 AM PST by y6162 (ater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

The MSM controls the liberal mindset. They know conservatives can’t be manipulated, so they have to try to convince ignorants that Palin is unqualified. They are laying the groundwork for defeating Palin in 2012 (if they survive that long)


9 posted on 12/16/2008 11:23:44 AM PST by prismsinc (AIP works for ME!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
Suppose she ends up taking Ted Stevens' Senate seat and spends the next four or eight years working on legislation and dealing with national and international issues.

Last I heard, Steven's lost reelection to a Democrat so that one isn't open and she has said she won't run in the primary against the current Republican for the other seat.

10 posted on 12/16/2008 11:23:53 AM PST by CedarDave (This bumper sticker stays on my pickup: "I'm voting for Sarah!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
For some reason, Palin was met with almost instant dislike after McCain named her as his running mate. We can't recall another political figure who drew that kind of reaction so quickly.

Vampires' reaction to a Cross is the vernacular explanation.

Here's what God says about it:
2 Cor 2:14-17

11 posted on 12/16/2008 11:24:00 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MahatmaGandu

Who is McCain? Never heard of him.


12 posted on 12/16/2008 11:24:01 AM PST by Pfesser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Ted Stevens doesn’t have a Senate seat.


13 posted on 12/16/2008 11:24:11 AM PST by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it to defend in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

It was more than hysteria. It was the most dishonorable, hateful, sexist, gutter-level smear campaign I have ever witnessed. The leftists hate her because she is everything they aren’t... and she looks good doing it.


14 posted on 12/16/2008 11:25:04 AM PST by SolidWood (Sarah Palin - Everything that is Sweetness and Light! WE STAND WITH HER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands

Who care about Stephanopolous? He’s a Clinton Cronie.
Yes a Clinton Cronie sitting in the seat that David Brinkley once sat in. What a joke! Now, You have Obama who is nothing but a yankee crook from Chicago. In 4 years it will be apparent to all that he is not as he appears.
people will be looking for somone who is outside the Washington sphere. Palin fits that bill nicely.


15 posted on 12/16/2008 11:26:45 AM PST by DOGHEAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
Palin will have to graduate from Harvard before she can run again....in the public’s eyes.

This is what leftwing propaganda has come to, one cannot participate in government if one is not highly educated by the liberal elite.

16 posted on 12/16/2008 11:27:45 AM PST by roses of sharon ("No socialist system can be established without a political police.", Churchill -1945)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

“We can’t understand why, six weeks after the election, it’s still open season on Palin in the media.”

They’ve taken her measure and she scares them, as a politician and as a female.


17 posted on 12/16/2008 11:28:56 AM PST by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MahatmaGandu

I fully expect McCain will announce he is a Candidate for the Presidency in 2010.


18 posted on 12/16/2008 11:33:15 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
That got headlines that read in effect, "McCain refuses to endorse Palin," and prompted talking heads to comment that he apparently had changed his mind about Palin's qualification for office. Of course that's not what he said. And Stephanopoulos' question wasn't about that - it was about trying to pin McCain down on whether he would support Palin for the nomination in 2012.

Drive By Media at work - this country will never be the same again until there are limits put on the truthfulness of the DBM. With the First Amendment that will never ever happen. Palin must be destroyed as she represents an evil to the libtards now running this country. This person is not the only one to be destroyed by libtards - they have a huge list of paybacks for the wacko lefites. The America that many of you and I grew up is over, never to return - gone like a record made of wax.
19 posted on 12/16/2008 11:36:08 AM PST by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
MSM and the Demorats only trash someone if they are exceptionally good.

The more they trash Palin the higher our opinion of her.

20 posted on 12/16/2008 11:36:54 AM PST by Dustbunny (Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged. The Gipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson