Intereresting...exactly what does one have to do to be designated a troll?..
Apparently all anyone has to do is post the reasons, as he sees it, that the courts wont compel him to show proof....not based on their personal feelings about Obama, (Have voted republican each election since 1980 by the way) but based on their understanding of law and how the court system works.
As to why I show up on these threads...It’s because I find the subject interesting.
I apparently made the wrong assumption when I stumbled onto this site, I assumed that it was a place where people came and debated constitutional issues, turns out that some on this site want no debate whatsoever, they only want to read posts that reinforce their own oppinions.
Many posters though, do appear to give thoughful insights to their views and are able to argue their points without resorting to name calling.
Gotta admit though.....being put on your list really terrifies me......
“what does one have to do to be designated a troll?.. Apparently all anyone has to do is post the reasons, as he sees it, that the courts wont compel him to show proof.”
No that won’t do it. You have to deliberately misstate facts, and gratuitously insult those who don’t.
It’s perfectly true that our institutions will likely fail this test. The trolls say that’s because there is no test to fail, and those of us trying to uphold the constitution are simply paranoid.