You asked — “And this is the sort of ‘reasoning’ you think is corerect?...”
Okay, let’s look at the situation in which this applies, then...
The FReeper “Red Steel” said — “Fine. Let the Dem Congress do nothing about it and we will see them get routed that would rival their beating they got 1994.”
Okay, the idea is that the voters are going to “route” the Dem Congress because (supposedly) the voters are going to be outraged that this Congress did not kick out Obama (and thus, the Congress is not doing their job).
So, you’re talking about the *same voters* who put Obama into office in the first place, by greater margins of the voting public than Bill Clinton ever got and greater margins than George Bush ever got.
Therefore, my question is *how* are *these same voters* going to kick out this Congress (for not removing Obama) when it’s *these voters* that put Obama in there, in the first place... LOL...
There is a *mighty disconnect* from reality in your thinking on this process... :-)
—
And then — “... but it doesn’t work at Freerepublic.”
And what works at Free Republic doesn’t appear to be working at the voting booth... therein lies the problem...
Bless your little heart, you’re confused. You need to ping RedSteel to make your argument. I think this falls in the category of ‘strawman diversion’ ... picking up someone else’s comments, attributing the ideas to me, then attacking those ideas. Bless your heart, you’ll figure it out, perhaps.