I agree wholeheartedly, DoughtyOne. It's definitely a little bit of heaven on earth. And, I agree with all of Dennis Prager's points in the article. His conclusions are backed up by good reasoning.
Isn’t the fundamental issue really just a matter of pitting the way things are (author’s premise) against the way things might be (dissenters’ premise)? If male sexuality and motivation are essentially adjustable, rational, mediated by depth of relationship, then the author’s points are debatable. If not, then the dissent is nonsense. Simple...
Thank you Arasina.