Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 12/24/2008 2:47:48 AM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:

Locked - civility suffering here. Personal attacks, calling people names, insulting them just isn’t nice - and it can easily result in being banned - just a word to the wise.



Skip to comments.

BREAKING -- Berg v Obama - Scheduled for SCOTUS Conference TWICE on Jan 16
US Supreme Court ^ | 12/23/08 | US Supreme Court

Posted on 12/23/2008 12:42:44 PM PST by BP2

No. 08-570
Title:
Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed: October 31, 2008
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  Case Nos.: (08-4340)
Rule 11

~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 18 2008 Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 1 2008 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter.
Dec 15 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2009.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 18 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 23 2008 Application (08A505) referred to the Court.
Dec 23 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.


---------------

No. 08A505
Title:

Philip J. Berg, Applicant
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed:
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

  Case Nos.: (08-4340)

~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter.
Dec 15 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy.

Dec 18 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 23 2008 Application (08A505) referred to the Court.
Dec 23 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1600penn; bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; creepy; obama; obci; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-305 next last
To: trumandogz
I have a Birth Certificate issued by the US Embassy to prove it.

You sure it is not a State Department document to register the overseas birth that your parents received after your parents present proof of a foreign birth, like a birth certificate?

141 posted on 12/23/2008 6:46:08 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Nipfan
I don’t think that trumandogz has any real personal animosity towards Berg. Its all just a marvellous excuse to defend Obama and muddy the constitutional waters which, going in his/her each and every post (at least the ones that I’ve seen) is his/her sole purpose on this board.

Could he be a t....?

142 posted on 12/23/2008 6:48:40 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: mlo
Where is this precise definition and what is it?

What's the precise definition of native born citizen? What is it?

143 posted on 12/23/2008 6:50:41 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
"To be "natural born" one must be born within the United States to TWO US citizen (but not necessarily natural born) parents."

This is simply not true. No matter how many FR posts and internet pages keep repeating that it is.

144 posted on 12/23/2008 6:51:32 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Now, can you find something in the Constitution, Legislation or Case Law that defines Natural Born Citizen?

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401----000-.html

145 posted on 12/23/2008 6:52:36 PM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
"How about 150 years of Presidential precedent during which every President was a living breathing definition of a Natural Born Citizen [except one who hid his past and burned his papers because he knew he wasn't one]. Will that suffice???"

No. They also happened to all be white males. Does that mean the constitution requires them to be white males?

146 posted on 12/23/2008 6:55:23 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Is that picture you?!!?


147 posted on 12/23/2008 6:56:40 PM PST by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Berg v Obama has been in conference twice already and was denied. First it was presented by Souter and then by Kennedy. The justice presenting the case can often have little bearing on whether it will be accepted or not.

His applications for stay of election have been denied, but not his writ of certiorari, which is scheduled for conference on the 9th of January.

148 posted on 12/23/2008 7:01:55 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
"What's the precise definition of native born citizen? What is it?"

Don't lose the context. I was responding to someone that said "natural born citizen" was very precisely defined. So I asked him to produce it.

Of course he couldn't. All he had was an essay.

149 posted on 12/23/2008 7:07:02 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: luvadavi
Say,'dogz, how much do they pay you trolls? Flat rate or per post?

Nobody infests thread after thread for weeks, months, with their one-track mind comments--for nothing.

I've inquired about working the net for Obama since Obama has so much money to throw around in his coffers but they won't give me a hint. ;-)

150 posted on 12/23/2008 7:08:01 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: mlo
Don't lose the context. I was responding to someone that said "natural born citizen" was very precisely defined. So I asked him to produce it.

Oh it's in context. Do you know the precise meaning of natural born citizen and the precise meaning of native born citizen? What is it? You must have an idea of what it is since you asked him... or is it really you don't? I'm asking.

151 posted on 12/23/2008 7:14:53 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
"To be "natural born" one must be born within the United States to TWO US citizen (but not necessarily natural born) parents."

This is still not true. There still isn't a 'born a citizen but not a natural born citizen' class (a 3rd class) of citizen. This definition of 'natural born' that you keep touting does not exist. How could the FFs have meant this alternate definition when there was no discussion or documentation to support it? The COTUS uses the term 'natural born' and it means exactly what the dictionary says it means: 'having a quality or status from birth.' There is no record of any debate regarding an alternative meaning for the expression and no rational reason to believe that some kind of consensus in accord with your statements was ever achieved. Particularly in light of the absence of any documentation by the FFs supporting your position.

152 posted on 12/23/2008 7:17:24 PM PST by calenel (The Democratic Party is a Criminal Enterprise. It is the Socialist Mafia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Nipfan
Its all just a marvellous excuse to defend Obama and muddy the constitutional waters

The constitutional waters are crystal clear which is why these BC conspiracy cases keep getting laughed out of court, denied, no comment, week after week, case after case. And when Monday, January 19th's "Denied, no comment" list comes out, Berg v. Obama will be no exception.

You can bet money on this.

153 posted on 12/23/2008 7:19:23 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: mlo

You simply do not understand the law.


154 posted on 12/23/2008 7:19:48 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks allot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
"You simply do not understand the law."

What law would that be? Produce the law that says what you think it says.

155 posted on 12/23/2008 7:25:50 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
"And if he were born in Kenya, yes he is a liar but he would still be a natural born citizen in that at the moment of his birth he became an American."

Factually incorrect conclusion. If Obama was born in Kenya (or anyplace else not in the US) he can not be a citizen at birth. The law in effect at the time of Obama's birth was:

1952 The Immigration and Nationality Act of June 27, 1952, 66 Stat. 163, 235, 8 U.S. Code Section 1401 (b). (Section 301 of the Act).

"Section 301. (a) The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

"(1) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;

"(7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States, who prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years."

Obama's mother was not old enough to pass on citizenship as she could have been physically present in the US no more than 4 years 8 months and 6 days after she turned 14 even if you ignore all the travel outside of the US during that period.

156 posted on 12/23/2008 7:27:23 PM PST by calenel (The Democratic Party is a Criminal Enterprise. It is the Socialist Mafia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
The context of this entire discussion is that some people are claiming "natural born citizen" means certain special things that are not apparent in those three words. So when someone offers that it is specifically defined somewhere it makes sense to ask for that definition. Asking me to define some other term has nothing to do with it.

But I'll humor you. Both "natural born citizen" and "native born citizen" mean anyone that is a citizen by birth.

157 posted on 12/23/2008 7:29:44 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: calenel

bookmark / bump


158 posted on 12/23/2008 7:31:24 PM PST by freepersup (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
To be "natural born" one must be born within the United States to TWO US citizen (but not necessarily natural born) parents.

Where does this definition exist in the Constitution or established U.S. case law?

159 posted on 12/23/2008 7:33:58 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: SW6906
Is that picture you?!!?

ROTFLMAO!

No, that looks like my Uncle Ermie, he's the heavy drinker of cheap beer in the family  :-)

"snicker"

160 posted on 12/23/2008 7:44:38 PM PST by Stoat (Palin / Coulter 2012: A Strong America Through Unapologetic Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-305 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson