Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
here's another reference:

Senator Pinckney's opinions do not establish Constitutionality any more than Senator Feinstein's opinions do. Plenty of elected officials wish that the Constitution says something else besides what it clearly says. All this wishing doesn't make it true.

Now post some case law.

232 posted on 12/23/2008 10:43:22 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: Drew68
I'm tired, so here's the fencepost from someone else you can argue with:

Thomas Jefferson wrote Virginia’s birthright law of 1777 requiring the father to be a citizen.

“We can say with confidence that a natural-born citizen of the United States means those persons born whose father the United States already has an established jurisdiction over, i.e., born to father’s who are themselves citizens of the United States. “

~~~~~~~~~~~

The “natural born” Clause’s origins have been traced to a July 25, 1787 letter from John Jay to the presiding officer of the Constitutional Convention, George Washington. Jay wrote, “Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

To be considered Natural-Born, both parents must be citizens, otherwise, we’ll have anchor babies running for POTUS in the future.

241 posted on 12/23/2008 11:15:52 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson