To: TonyStark; trumandogz
I don’t think that trumandogz has any real personal animosity towards Berg. Its all just a marvellous excuse to defend Obama and muddy the constitutional waters which, going in his/her each and every post (at least the ones that I’ve seen) is his/her sole purpose on this board.
55 posted on
12/23/2008 2:00:18 PM PST by
Nipfan
(The desire to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it - H L Mencken)
To: Nipfan
Its all just a marvellous excuse to defend Obama and muddy the constitutional waters which, going in his/her each and every post (at least the ones that I’ve seen) is his/her sole purpose on this board. Are you really sure that all of my 11,000 posts in four years have been to defend Obama?
60 posted on
12/23/2008 2:03:30 PM PST by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: Nipfan
I don’t think that trumandogz has any real personal animosity towards Berg. Its all just a marvellous excuse to defend Obama and muddy the constitutional waters which, going in his/her each and every post (at least the ones that I’ve seen) is his/her sole purpose on this board. Could he be a t....?
To: Nipfan
Its all just a marvellous excuse to defend Obama and muddy the constitutional watersThe constitutional waters are crystal clear which is why these BC conspiracy cases keep getting laughed out of court, denied, no comment, week after week, case after case. And when Monday, January 19th's "Denied, no comment" list comes out, Berg v. Obama will be no exception.
You can bet money on this.
153 posted on
12/23/2008 7:19:23 PM PST by
Drew68
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson