Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz

The way the law would work is that what was in force at that relevant time would be the law one would be tried under.

So, with Plyler v. Doe, that came 21 years after his birth, so it wouldn’t apply to his status at birth.

For those interested:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plyler_v._Doe


91 posted on 12/23/2008 2:57:44 PM PST by ConservativeMind (What's "Price Gouging"? Should government force us to sell to the 15th highest bidder on eBay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind
So, with Plyler v. Doe, that came 21 years after his birth, so it wouldn’t apply to his status at birth.

Yes it would, just as the illegal aliens that were banned from Tyler, Texas schools prior to Plyler could go to school after Plyler.

The Equal Protection Clause would preclude the state from establishing two classes of citizens or people.

295 posted on 12/24/2008 2:27:38 AM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson