Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'I'm not a vendetta cop-killer'
Las Vegas Review-Journal ^ | 31 dec 08 | Lawrence Mower

Posted on 12/31/2008 6:12:44 AM PST by rellimpank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: SampleMan

“I’m just amazed that the police departments that are very cautious about confronting criminals when danger is known are so cavalier about charging into the unknown.”

Around here the SWAT team is made up of a bunch of military washouts with Rambo fantasies. Most appear to be pumped up on steroids.

They are probably too stupid to understand the inherent dangers.


21 posted on 12/31/2008 8:24:11 AM PST by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

“I hate teh problems of no-knocks, but I also hate the idea of asking decent men to give up an element of surprise and volunteer to be a target.”

As others have stated, there is just no need to do it this way. A couple of grams of cocaine, or a pound of pot is NOT a life and death emergency.

Much safer to arrest the suspect outside of the home and then search the home. If a few get away, too bad, there will be other chances to get them.

The no knock tactic gets people killed.


22 posted on 12/31/2008 8:30:02 AM PST by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad

you’d be surprised :)


23 posted on 12/31/2008 8:38:25 AM PST by TV Dinners (Hope is not a Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
"I take it you have volunteered to be that guy standing at the door taking the first shots, or are you just asking others to do it?"

Funny thing that cops did precisely what I described for the entire history of our Republic up until the onset of the "War on Drugs". Are today's cops any less courageous??? Or were yesterday's cops just foolish.

24 posted on 12/31/2008 9:47:55 AM PST by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

“On Dec. 7, 9 and 21, detectives went to Dozier’s home, at 2972 Panorama Ridge Drive, and purchased cocaine from him, his arrest report says.”

http://www.lvrj.com/news/36922174.html


25 posted on 12/31/2008 4:41:14 PM PST by Mojave (http://barackobamajokes.googlepages.com/obama_funny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
For that matter, wouldn't the chance of violence have been reduced -- in a home where police should have known young children were present -- if someone had simply telephoned the home, explaining police were approaching the door with a warrant ... preferably during daylight hours?

Some will say such a procedure would be naive -- drug dealers could use the time to flush their product down the toilet.

But no cocaine was found -- and a dealer who can eliminate all his product in one toilet flush isn't really very big-time, is he?

--- http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/37058594.html

Not to mention, if they're all that worried about a "flush", shut off the water, to the whole street if necessary. Then make that phone call. Then call from the outside for the suspect to come out with his hands up.

I'd give up my water for a couple of hours to prevent a police home invasion of possibly the wrong house.

26 posted on 01/04/2009 6:51:04 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
I hate teh problems of no-knocks, but I also hate the idea of asking decent men to give up an element of surprise and volunteer to be a target.

What decent men would that be? The ones who sought the job of kicking down doors in the middle of the night and shooting anyone or anything that gets in their way? Just the job that decent men everwhere aspire to. Much as you might hate the idea of citizens having rights, those rights exist, and all of the unconstitutional BS of the war on___ (fill in the blank) doesn't abgrogate those rights because as some dead white American said "rights come from God - not government."

27 posted on 01/04/2009 6:59:35 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
On Dec. 7, 9 and 21, detectives went to Dozier’s home, at 2972 Panorama Ridge Drive, and purchased cocaine from him, his arrest report says

of course police NEVER lie

28 posted on 01/04/2009 7:04:07 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: EEDUDE

But that way they do not get to use their tacticool stuff or training (which our taxes paid for).


29 posted on 01/04/2009 7:42:06 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Right. It was all a vast conspiracy to arrest the coke dealer.


30 posted on 01/04/2009 8:04:02 AM PST by Mojave (http://barackobamajokes.googlepages.com/obama_funny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TV Dinners

I hope they fry the nit wit over bearing police that performed the raid. He was found guilty by association. I would love to see if all the evidence made it to the store room or was a line or two missing.


31 posted on 01/04/2009 8:06:36 AM PST by Wavrnr10 (Eagles soar....but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wavrnr10

oh... it’s the cops fault. not the idiots that called for the raid.


32 posted on 01/04/2009 8:09:36 AM PST by TV Dinners (Hope is not a Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Wavrnr10
He was found guilty by association.

Yep. The police "associated" the drug dealer with the cocaine he sold to an undercover officer on multiple occasions.

33 posted on 01/04/2009 8:11:51 AM PST by Mojave (http://barackobamajokes.googlepages.com/obama_funny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

They should have arrested him when he sold them cocaine the first time.
But that makes too much sense.


34 posted on 01/04/2009 8:13:21 AM PST by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEDUDE; SampleMan
I’m just amazed that the police departments that are very cautious about confronting criminals when danger is known are so cavalier about charging into the unknown.

That's why they charge in at O'dark thirty.

It's known that the occupants are sleeping, and a sleeping (or half-awake) person offers little to no resistance.

35 posted on 01/04/2009 8:14:39 AM PST by MamaTexan (I am not a political, collective, administrative, public, corporate or legal entity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
I gotta concur. If there is no pressing need to serve the warrant (someone being killed, raped, etc.) it would be safer for the police and the public to serve these warrants by different means.

Given reported incidents of home invaders yelling "police!" to make defenders hesitate to resist, if any police want to discuss anything with me I would be more comfortable seeing a marked police car in my driveway and a uniformed cop outside my door handing me a warrant in a civilized way.

36 posted on 01/04/2009 8:17:29 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: winodog
They should have arrested him when he sold them cocaine the first time.

Right. Undercover officers should always reveal themselves.

37 posted on 01/04/2009 8:20:37 AM PST by Mojave (http://barackobamajokes.googlepages.com/obama_funny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
It's known that the occupants are sleeping, and a sleeping (or half-awake) person offers little to no resistance.

In my case I would be likely up and getting ready to go to work at what other consider "O-dark-30".

38 posted on 01/04/2009 8:21:23 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
In my case I would be likely up and getting ready to go to work at what other consider "O-dark-30".

LOL! I've seen jobs with 'those' kind of schedules. Thanks, but no thanks! :-)

39 posted on 01/04/2009 8:33:47 AM PST by MamaTexan (I am not a political, collective, administrative, public, corporate or legal entity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
That's why they charge in at O'dark thirty. It's known that the occupants are sleeping, and a sleeping (or half-awake) person offers little to no resistance.

Going in at O'dark thirty without proper declaration is a good way to get shot by your standard home owner. I live by a very good assumption that someone breaking in my front door at 3am is up to no good and intends me harm. Further, a person in that situation has only been provided seconds to make a life or death decision after being torn out of REM sleep. Making it doubtful that they cognitively understood the screaming that woke them up.

Kick in my front door and start screaming at 2am and my first reaction is to grab my gun. Three seconds later, I'm on my stair landing and I see two people in black running up my staircase towards my children's rooms. I now have 1 second or less to decide to shoot or put my family at their mercy.

Doesn't sound too safe to me.

40 posted on 01/04/2009 9:10:20 AM PST by SampleMan (Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson