Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ron Jeremy
A police officer friend of mine tells me that if he stops a motorist and the motorist admits he has been drinking, that he is now obligated to arrest him for DUI. Even if he passes all field sobriety tests. An admission of drinking ANY amount of alcohol to a police office will put you behind bars and quite possibly destroy your life by giving you a criminal record.

I got caught up in a roadblock a few years ago in South Boston. I had had a couple of beers at a restaurant but was absolutely not under the influence. Nevertheless, when the cop shined the flashlight in my face and asked me if I had had anything to drink, I lied to him and said that I had had nothing to drink. He then thanked me in waved me through.

My cop friend told me that if I had told him I had a couple of beers, there would have been a 100% chance of him pulling me out of my car (in front of my wife) and placing me under arrest for DUI.

To this day, I still feel crappy about lying to the police but I know the alternative would have been a night in jail and quite possibly a criminal record that would have precluded me from holding the job I have currently.

With respect to DUI's, this country really is a lot like Nazi Germany. Of course, all these roadblocks and sham DUI arrests of decent people who had the misfortune to have a glass of wine on the wrong night, do absolutely nothing to stem the true problem of drunken driving. People with an alcohol problem will continue to drink and drive regardless of the consequences. We hear all the time of people with multiple drunk driving arrests who go right back to it as soon as they are let out of jail. Even taking their license away doesn't stop them. Serial drunk drivers almost invariably also get charged for driving without a license!

If you really want to put a stop to drunk driving, do away with the roadblocks and the persecution of decent people and just put unmarked cruisers out on the highways or park them at bars and taverns. You will very quickly be able to identify the drunk drivers as those will be the ones swerving all over the place and being a menace to other drivers.

20 posted on 12/31/2008 3:21:48 PM PST by SamAdams76 (I am 62 days away from outliving John F. Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SamAdams76
If you really want to put a stop to drunk driving, do away with the roadblocks and the persecution of decent people and just put unmarked cruisers out on the highways or park them at bars and taverns. You will very quickly be able to identify the drunk drivers as those will be the ones swerving all over the place and being a menace to other drivers.

As the rest of traffic enforcement, the point isn't to catch the most dangerous offenders. It's to catch the most offenders.

To figure out why, just follow the money.

31 posted on 12/31/2008 3:30:41 PM PST by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76

If you weren’t under the influence, then you shouldn’t have had an issue with the tests. You could have walked the line and passed the Breathalyzer.


50 posted on 12/31/2008 3:48:53 PM PST by ConservativeMind (What's "Price Gouging"? Should government force us to sell to the 15th highest bidder on eBay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76

I’m sure they will come up with a DUI exception to the entrapment defense as soon as it gets to the Supreme Court.


118 posted on 12/31/2008 4:41:32 PM PST by Camel Joe ("All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others"- The Pigs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson