Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gondring
Here's the punchline of the whole article, and the whole debate on the topic, for that matter:

Although some might consider a pacifier a more socially acceptable way to comfort their child, Paul said she would prefer that her child receive comfort at her breast.

81 posted on 01/02/2009 8:18:16 PM PST by wimpycat (Hyperbole is the opiate of the activist wacko.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: wimpycat

Six year old children should need neither a pacifier nor a breast.

This brain-damaged woman is crippling her child. As somebody else pointed out, if this kid doesn’t become a shut-in playing whatever version of World of Warcraft is out in ten years, he’s going to lose every date he ever comes close to getting as soon as the girl searches his name and finds out he was still attached to the teat at 6.


88 posted on 01/02/2009 8:27:12 PM PST by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: wimpycat
Much more healthy to have the kid get attached to an inanimate object, eh?
122 posted on 01/03/2009 12:25:26 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson