[Will88]

You did not read my thread.

Why not just reference several books to be read. I scanned your link, but summarize whatever interpretation you have.

But nothing you post will change the fact that as these situations come up, if they do, they courts will settle the questions, as they do on most everything. Not saying that's how it should be, but that is the way it is.

[Calpernia]

Now I know, you not only didn’t read my thread, you didn’t even click the link. I referenced books for sources too.

[El Gato]

But nothing you post will change the fact that as these situations come up, if they do, they courts will settle the questions, as they do on most everything. Not saying that's how it should be, but that is the way it is.

It pretty much *has* to that way. But It would be nice if they would *decide* in this instance, instead of doing all they can to *not* make a ruling in these cases.