Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Entrepreneur

One of my favorite books of all time, and certainly my favorite philosophical book. A great defense of, and case for, liberty.

Since reading it, I’ve wondered if it were possible to reconcile it’s meaning with Christianity. My conclusion is that Rand’s ideal would only work in a society where people have a Judeo-Christian ethic because not everyone would seek a fair exchange. Rand would hate that idea, however.


24 posted on 01/03/2009 10:16:32 AM PST by Lou Budvis ("I did not have sex with that woman..." = "I did not have contact with the governor..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lou Budvis
Since reading it, I’ve wondered if it were possible to reconcile it’s meaning with Christianity. My conclusion is that Rand’s ideal would only work in a society where people have a Judeo-Christian ethic because not everyone would seek a fair exchange. Rand would hate that idea, however.

Agree. One of the things Rand misses in the book is charity. I wish she had been able to write it from a Christian's standpoint, but I can see why she didn't (besides her not being a Christian), as it would have been twice as difficult a write, and frankly it would not have had the ability to preach to the chior who needs it most. :) Christians already have an individualist core, or they should if they really think about their relationship with God.

34 posted on 01/03/2009 10:37:02 AM PST by MarineBrat (The New York Times is a Communist Kamikaze.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson