Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why is Paki an unacceptable word, but not Brit? Because of Britain's bitter racial history
London Times ^ | January 12, 2009 | Murad Ahmed

Posted on 01/11/2009 4:59:19 PM PST by GOPGuide

Our little Paki friend... Ahmed.” Oh boy. I've heard that one before. But not as recently as the friends I spoke to yesterday in Oldham, a place where racial tensions spilled into riots not long ago. Apparently, they still get called Paki all the time. By whom? “Oh, just little kids on the street. What can you do? They're only children.” Prince Harry is not a child. He is unlucky only in that, unlike most young men, his worst moments end up splashed across the front page of newspapers.

That he thought it acceptable to use the word Paki to refer to a Pakistani colleague represents a pathetic failure in his upbringing. Someone, somewhere along the line - a wise grandparent perhaps - should have told him to cut it out. These days the word Paki is used only by those who don't know any better, rather than by those who should. The Equalities and Human Rights Commission thinks that we need an inquiry into the Prince's behaviour. What would we discover? That the third in line to the throne is a bit of an idiot? That is an open-and-shut case. But we should have an inquiry about the word Paki.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: immigration; islam; princeharry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 01/11/2009 4:59:20 PM PST by GOPGuide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
What would we discover? That the third in line to the throne is a bit of an idiot? That is an open-and-shut case.

Ouch. That's going to leave a mark...

2 posted on 01/11/2009 5:01:14 PM PST by NCjim ("Lies have to be covered up, truth can run around naked." - Johnny Cash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

As I recall, Britain’s “bitter racial history” involved ending the slave trade, whereas Arabs “bitter racial history” includes slavery up to this day.

But of course, this immigrant fifth columnist has been taught that only whites can have a “bitter racial history.”


3 posted on 01/11/2009 5:01:30 PM PST by GOPGuide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Maybe he was talking about Dumbo !


4 posted on 01/11/2009 5:02:17 PM PST by Renegade (You go tell my buddies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

I hope that before I die when some third worlder is insulted the one they are complaininng about says, “that is what you are!”


5 posted on 01/11/2009 5:04:59 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
Paki!
Paki!
Paki!

If you don't like it, go the hell home.

6 posted on 01/11/2009 5:09:36 PM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Abortion has become little more than the New Left's execution of political prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Fantasy cricket team

http://fantasy.cricket.com/team/paki-power


7 posted on 01/11/2009 5:11:47 PM PST by milestogo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

The words that a society bans are largely accients of history.

“Nigger”, for example, is similar to a dozen other words in French, Italian, Spanish and Portugese all descended from the latin adjective “niger” - which meant the color black.

But because it was used for a race that was enslaved and lynched and denied basic rights, it has horrible associations.

I wonder if Paki is really in that category though. Surely the Brits had bad names for various Indian groups but Paki sounds pretty generic.


8 posted on 01/11/2009 5:14:21 PM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

I thought Paki was only offensive if you called an Indian person a Paki. My bad.


9 posted on 01/11/2009 5:14:31 PM PST by toothfairy86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: GOPGuide

Paki...Brit. There. I just said both. They’ll probably be the same thing before long, anyway. ;-)


11 posted on 01/11/2009 5:17:55 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Seems all sort of silly to this poster.

I’m ok with whatever.

But don’t even think about calling me an “Amero”.

Just saying.


12 posted on 01/11/2009 5:21:45 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (During any "d" administration: USA's msm, become indistinguishable from the ussr's pravda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: gondramB
In your reference to the word "n*gg*r" you stated:
But because it was used for a race that was enslaved and lynched and denied basic rights, it has horrible associations.

I would beg to differ, or should I say "add to", in why the word is demeaning. What is most demeaning is that the utterance of the word is the fastest way to say one is less than another, a lower class, something sub-human, something not worth bothering with. No other word has been so summed up as being so degrading as this one word. (And for that reason, I am always dumbfounded how easily it comes off the tongue of so many blacks when joking with each other ...).

I am wondering if this same use of the term 'paki' in UK is why it is determined to be racist speach over there.

14 posted on 01/11/2009 5:24:05 PM PST by AgThorn (Bush is my president, but he needs to protect our borders. FIRST, before any talk of "Amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
Without the burden of modern political correctness, the proper term for a person from Pakistan would be “Pak”. (And still is in India.) Just as the term for a person from Afghanistan is “Afghan”. The suffix “istan” means “place of” in Farsi. Thus Pakistan is “the place of the Paks”; and “Pakistani” would be something like: “a person from the place of the Paks”. That doesn't mean that “Paki” isn't derogatory (by usage) — although it could probably be considered a term of endearment for army buddies.
15 posted on 01/11/2009 5:24:49 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: GOPGuide

Once more, without the wierd characters.

Without the burden of modern political correctness, the proper term for a person from Pakistan would be “Pak”. (And still is in India.) Just as the term for a person from Afghanistan is “Afghan”. The suffix “istan” means “ the place of” in Farsi. Thus Pakistan is “the place of the Paks”; and “Pakistani” would be something like: “a person from the place of the Paks”. That doesn’t mean that “Paki” isn’t derogatory (by usage) — although it could probably be considered a term of endearment for army buddies.


17 posted on 01/11/2009 5:27:45 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

So, Is calling someone from the USA = Yank racist?
Is calling someone from Australia = Aussie racist?
Is calling someone from Canada = Canuck racist?
Is calling someone from Sweden = Swede racist?
etc.


18 posted on 01/11/2009 5:28:19 PM PST by LegendHasIt (Freepmail me if you want to join the Precious Metals ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
As I recall, Britain’s “bitter racial history” involved ending the slave trade, whereas Arabs “bitter racial history” includes slavery up to this day.

Excellent point. The history of British colonialism in Africa is simultaneously the history of the abolition of the African slave trade.

19 posted on 01/11/2009 5:28:45 PM PST by denydenydeny (If pigs could vote, the man with the slop bucket would be elected swineherd every time-OS Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt

“So, Is calling someone from the USA = Yank racist?”

-

Well actually.

Back in the day ... I do believe the Brits intended it to be so. Something about Yankee Doodle.

We just didn’t worry about whether it was, or not. :)

Made a song about it.


20 posted on 01/11/2009 5:32:20 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (During any "d" administration: USA's msm, become indistinguishable from the ussr's pravda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson