Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mother of Octuplets Has 6 Other Children
Fox News ^ | January 30, 2009

Posted on 01/30/2009 2:19:36 AM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: Canticle_of_Deborah

They’re keeping her name confidential...but they give her mother’s name.

No one will ever figure out who she is.


21 posted on 01/30/2009 4:30:16 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

I need to remarry a woman that is willing to have this many babies, in Alaska we all get a dividend check usually near $2,000 a year, last fall it was over $3,200.

With 14 kids and each one gets at least $1500-3,000 a year it would really add up!

Invested properly those kids could each be a millionaire by the time they reach 18.


22 posted on 01/30/2009 4:39:33 AM PST by Eye of Unk (How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words! SA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
I was actually shocked to find out she already had 6 little children. This woman will probably end up with a TV show on TLC, like Jon and Kate Plus 8.

Unless her name rhymes with 14, it's not going to fly.

23 posted on 01/30/2009 4:41:24 AM PST by stayathomemom (Cat herder and empty nester)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

Mom and dad’s home:

http://www.bittenandbound.com/

Nadya must be the mother of the babies - click on Angela Suleman in Whittier:

http://www.zabasearch.com/query1_zaba.php?sname=ANGELA%20SULEMAN&state=CA&ref=&se=&doby=&city=&name_style=1&tm=&tmr=


24 posted on 01/30/2009 4:42:11 AM PST by FarRightFanatic (It wasn't an election. It was a socialist coup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

The more I see things like this, the more I question my opposition to abortion.


25 posted on 01/30/2009 4:48:29 AM PST by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

I can’t imagine a scenario that makes a woman with six children being involved in an elective procedure that results in her having eight more anything but a travesty.

We can hold off on judgment as long as we want, but there is simply nothing I can think of that would make any part of this event less than sad.

This is obviously my own personal opinion (IMHO)and I’m sure there are many who would not agree.


26 posted on 01/30/2009 5:05:37 AM PST by jwparkerjr (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

Please don’t let this woman be an illegal alien.


27 posted on 01/30/2009 5:18:35 AM PST by wolfcreek (There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
"Obviously she won’t be working anymore if she ever was so again, who is paying for all this?"

We are. Just as we are paying for her other six 'fatherless' children, since she's a ""single mother"".

28 posted on 01/30/2009 5:18:45 AM PST by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

The doctor who performed the fertility treatments should lose his license to practice medicine.

Six children under the age of 7 and he’s treating her.

I suspect that since it’s California fertility treatments are covered by medical insurance. Most likely paid for by the state.


29 posted on 01/30/2009 5:21:06 AM PST by Carley (Remember when we had a real President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

I’m glad there’s a daddy with a job. I hope he makes enough money to take care of 14 children, but I have a sneaking suspicion that some of their raising is going to be done on my dime.

Anyone who already has children should have to swear off public assistance before they have fertility treatments. Come to think of it, *anyone* should swear off public money before they have fertility treatments. The first, “natural” conception might be excused, but a turkey baster is intent.


30 posted on 01/30/2009 5:31:47 AM PST by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FarRightFanatic

When did Pamela Anderson turn into catwoman?

That was almost as fugly as Helen Thomas.


31 posted on 01/30/2009 5:33:54 AM PST by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

If the woman (or her family for that matter) had to support and raise these kids without pointing a gun to our heads and making us do it,

she probably wouldn’t have opted for fertility treatments.

Whaddaya think?


32 posted on 01/30/2009 5:35:24 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

Turn your back on Him,

and he obliges.


33 posted on 01/30/2009 5:36:31 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nonliberal

Abortion wouldn’t be necessary if the people making the decisions were to experience the consequences of those decisions, and seeing others experiencing the consequences.

You can choose not to engage in activity leading to pregnancy, you know...


34 posted on 01/30/2009 5:38:18 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

LOL - sorry! The next article down is about the Sulemans.


35 posted on 01/30/2009 5:38:35 AM PST by FarRightFanatic (It wasn't an election. It was a socialist coup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

We’ve lived in California for 19 years. California may win the battle with us this year. No sane, mature person would put up with all the money flying out the door for other, less responsible people. We’ll see what happens.


36 posted on 01/30/2009 5:43:34 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Carley
The doctor who performed the fertility treatments should lose his license to practice medicine.

I don't think the blame can be placed on the RE who treated her, yet. I suspect we're looking at fertility drugs and an IUI, not IVF. With that the chances of multiples are higher, yes, but I seriously doubt anyone expected 8 eggs to be produced, fertilized, and implanted successfully.

Or if it was IVF it could be very well that they did not transfer 8 eggs, but that some of the eggs split later into twins, thus producing 8 children. I know of several cases where that happened.

I have a co-worker whose wife did IUI - they started out with 2 eggs that were fertilized and then one split. So one of their fraternal twins has an identical twin.

37 posted on 01/30/2009 5:49:51 AM PST by elc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

I speak mostly out of frustration. I will be getting an IOU for my tax refund but I will still have to pay and pay and pay.


38 posted on 01/30/2009 5:50:35 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Carley
The doctor who performed the fertility treatments should lose his license to practice medicine.

Why would you turn over to a pussy mechanic control over a woman's decision whether to get pregnant? Why should he have any more to say on the matter than a car mechanic? Remember, your objections to the doctor is that he did not override a woman's liberty, not for medical reasons, but for purely social economic reasons-because she already had six kids and you, evidently, do not approve.

We are already at the point where physicians can lose their licenses, or at least sustain some sort of sanction, for failure to practice abortions, why compound the error? How can we say, "doctor, if you make the wrong social choices and not overrule your patients when you should, we will take away your license."

We do not need conservatives saying this, I'm sure Barak Obama will say it instead. If conservatism is to find its voice and to have its voice resonate, it must be on the issue of individual liberty. We should recognize the vast difference between the folly committed by our selves and our fellow citizens every minute of every day and the extreme folly of criminalizing behavior, even abberant, eccentric, or self-defeating behavior. There are many many things that people do from smoking to overeating which cost us all money but we do not support depriving fat people of their Hostess Twinkies because we have to pay more for insurance.

If it is "cheaper by the dozen", who can say that it is not better by 14?


39 posted on 01/30/2009 5:59:44 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

I saw this morning where the father is in the military, and is in Iraq.

This is insanity!


40 posted on 01/30/2009 6:01:57 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ("You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it." Dr. Adrian Rogers 1931-2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson