Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: J. Neil Schulman
"I just don’t think God’s instructions to these ancients was specifically applicable to men who set up housekeeping in West Hollywood or the Castro."

And therein is the original lie...."Hast God said?" When will people wake up and realize that their decision to selectively determine what God meant means that they have made for themselves a new god. One that looks like them. In fact, it is them. Hence, their god is too small.

This guy is of his father, the devil....so he should not wonder why his daughter follows along on the same wide path - which leads to destruction.

3 posted on 02/19/2009 11:51:03 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: anniegetyourgun

I think you need to respect the perspective for what it is - non-religious. In that light, this gentleman has provided you with a cogent, completely logical argument to support your cause within your own religious experience. “Marriage requires consummation,” being the operative observation of an obvious but overlooked fact.

Given the activity in question isn’t really sexual, meaning it is non-progenitive, what business does a Christian clergy of any sect or order have in blessing sexual play? There is certainly nothing Biblical that supports it, correct?

The whole QUESTION of this being MARRIAGE is out. As such, where does that put you within the perspective of church policy? Christian marriage, an institution that came from Christ Himself, is explicit in its Biblical definition.

So what would the Church like to call this, whatever it is - union, fraternity, partnership . . .

I for one BRISTLE at the term PARTNER, or PARTNERSHIP. I have a business partner, whose male, and in describing our relationship, wedding band affixed to my finger, it makes me cringe as soon as the word ‘partner’ escapes my lips. I feel like I have to further explain the context of the term.

Anyway, you ought to thank this gent in my opinion. He may not agree with your view of God and the Universe, but his observations on the language of the issue is, in my opinion, highly valuable to anyone debating it within their own church.

May God bless you richly.


7 posted on 02/19/2009 12:03:55 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: anniegetyourgun

The Hebrews thought Jesus was of the devil, too.

Sorry to see there are Pharisees on this board.


13 posted on 02/19/2009 12:13:58 PM PST by J. Neil Schulman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson