Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB
It also became increasingly untenable to insist upon “epicycles within epicycles” to explain how everything could be moving around a motionless Earth.

Data convinced people, good God fearing Christian people, that a literlist interpretation of Psalm 104:5 was in error.

Now nearly everyone in the Christian world accepts that the Earth circles the Sun, and that Psalm 104:5 doesn't mean anything more than that God made the Earth a safe place for us, a secure foundation.

155 posted on 02/19/2009 9:10:00 PM PST by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

Those were the predictions I was referring too.

in much the same way, it is useful predictions (i.e. not predicted correctly by any other means) that make developmental biology the current theory today and its the lack of useful predictions that prevent ID or any young earth theory from being current science.

And science class should really teach current science.


158 posted on 02/19/2009 9:19:05 PM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson