[editor-surveyor]

Marie2, I encourage you to read John Morris’ ICR article for yourself, and you will find that Mr Joke is lying as he always does as to the meaning of the article.

Morris cautions readers only due to the constantly changing river bed, and the varying quality of the remaining evidence.

[whattajoke]

Marie2, I encourage you to read John Morris’ ICR article for yourself

But don't you dare read the other links which certainly make my point more directly!

and you will find that Mr Joke is lying as he always does as to the meaning of the article.

Debatable. It is true that Morris is a bit wishy-washy on the matter. (Oh, look what I just did! I admitted you are probably right. If only you could do the same.)

The article's summation states, "Even though it would now be improper for creationists to continue to use the Paluxy data as evidence against evolution, in the light of these questions, there is still much that is not known about the tracks and continued research is in order."

Now, you can take that as editor-surveyor blithely does and state that the tracks are legitimate, or you can wonder why there is such doubt on the ONLY purported man-dino tracks in the world.