Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama administration tries to kill e-mail case
AP via Houston Chronicle ^ | 2.21.09 | PETE YOST

Posted on 02/21/2009 12:47:30 PM PST by trumandogz

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration, siding with former President George W. Bush, is trying to kill a lawsuit that seeks to recover what could be millions of missing White House e-mails.

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 02/21/2009 12:47:30 PM PST by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

BDS strikes again. Even if they are recovered, what purpose would it serve? How many of them are of a classified nature and not subject to FOI anyway?

The Bush haters are getting even more crazy.


2 posted on 02/21/2009 12:50:28 PM PST by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Too many e-mails from Pretend Prex to Vera Baker, and the Hawaii Dept. of Vital Statistics perhaps?
3 posted on 02/21/2009 12:51:22 PM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Well..., you can’t say that the Obama Administration is against everything that Bush did... LOL...


4 posted on 02/21/2009 12:52:14 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Leftards never learn.


5 posted on 02/21/2009 12:54:47 PM PST by chuck_the_tv_out
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Only when Obama finds it to his advantage. Oh yeah,...LoL!


6 posted on 02/21/2009 12:55:34 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
This is simple enough.

Swords have two edges to them usually.

Give in on this intrustion into executive privilege--and they are going to suffer when Judicial Watch gets a hair up its backside.

Sorry Lefties, it may actually be that Obama will have more to hide than Chimp-Bush-Hitler.

7 posted on 02/21/2009 12:55:38 PM PST by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Star Traveler

Wow, the DUmmies will be pissed.


9 posted on 02/21/2009 12:57:58 PM PST by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: txnativegop
BDS?

Those are ‘our’ emails. Sunshine in Gov’t is a good thing.

10 posted on 02/21/2009 12:59:27 PM PST by BGHater (Tyranny is always better organised than freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lysandru

waddayamean, Obama has already proven he intends to hide everything. Why would he want this to go forward and retrieve anything?! He is setting precedent here people. Do not ask for documents or emails. They have been scrubbed, deleted or shredded.

When asked for his senate records he said he didn’t have any. They may have been tossed he said.


11 posted on 02/21/2009 1:01:45 PM PST by OafOfOffice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Certainly anything that isn’t a national security secret should be open to public eyes.


12 posted on 02/21/2009 1:02:35 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Obama is probably afraid of what we can do to him if the case goes forward and the get-Bush minions get their way. Hopefully, Obama will be unsuccessful and he’ll end up delivering more “transparency” than he ever intended to deliver on. That, and the Bush administration will be exonerated when the truth comes out.


13 posted on 02/21/2009 1:04:54 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: BGHater

I know the emails are “ours”, but the dems want them for mock congressional investigations.

Who gets to decide what the president communicates about with friends, confidants, military people and the like should be made public.

Sunshine laws are all well and good. But a lot of the communications will be of a nature that public release of the information would be harmful to US operations or intelligence gathering operations.

Careful what you ask for. The Law of Unintended Consequences will soon raise its ugly head.


15 posted on 02/21/2009 1:05:08 PM PST by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Exactly.


16 posted on 02/21/2009 1:07:24 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

You said — “Only when Obama finds it to his advantage. Oh yeah,...LoL!”

Well, it’s as I thought about Obama. I always thought that his behavior would be “modified” by the actual and real-life requirements of the Office of President of the United States. And, as it is turning out, that is quite true.

Of course, he’s not a conservative, but at the same time, he sure isn’t the kind of liberal that his liberal voters have wanted either. So, his behavior has been somewhat modified from what he campaigned about and what his liberal voters thought he would be doing.

Another instance of that, was when some FReepers were commenting on a story about Obama authorizing some strikes in Pakistan. Many said it was a fluke and/or he didn’t have time to counter-act Bush’s actions there (it was only a few days after Obama’s inauguration).

However, just in the last few days, it has come out in another article that Obama has *stepped up* the campaign in Pakistan to an extent that Bush never had authorized before. In other words, Obama is going “past Bush” in going after the terrorists there. And it’s been a long while after his inauguration now.

I think that many posters here don’t realize the extent to which an candidate is modified by the position of his office, especially with being President of the United States and when you have certain “realities” come home to you.

Another area where I though Obama would be *limited* by realities of the situation, was in the economic crisis area. Sure, there are lots of things to complain about, just on that subject alone, in regards to Obama, but this crisis takes him away from doing a lot of the other things that he might have wanted to do, given a free hand without any pressing crisis on his hands (like this financial meltdown and the Great Depression which will deepen throughout 2009).

Not everything that Obama does is something that Bush and the Republicans wouldn’t do, themselves. And that’s the reality of the situation, too...


17 posted on 02/21/2009 1:07:31 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: txnativegop
We can start with this one.White House visitor records closed

Has Obama changed that policy?

Gov't should fear the public and every last word they type. They are accountable to US, this is future CYA.

18 posted on 02/21/2009 1:13:33 PM PST by BGHater (Tyranny is always better organised than freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

They are accountable to us. Put yourself in place of one of the visitors and you went at about the same time that a person later found to be engaged in corruption went there.

do you really think that anyone would listen to your protestations of innocence? No one would. Because of the vagaries of scheduling, you would be painted as corrupt along with the other guy.

Be Careful What You Ask For, You Might Just Get It.


19 posted on 02/21/2009 1:18:27 PM PST by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: txnativegop
Be Careful What You Ask For, You Might Just Get It.

I'll take my chances.
20 posted on 02/21/2009 1:21:34 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson