Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Recent Human Variation Is Not Evolution (evidence points to recent creation)
ICR ^ | February 23, 2009 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

Posted on 02/23/2009 10:05:02 AM PST by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-171 next last
To: rjsimmon
a situation favoring some purpose

If I have this straight, you are saying that evolution has a purpose?

81 posted on 02/23/2009 11:25:23 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
If they are not entirely an act of punishment, then either the tornados are sent as a reward or they are an act of chance. Which?

Logical fallicy. Simply because there is no discernable cause for punishment, does not mean that weather is not simply behaving as intended (see volcano reference above).

If God sends a tornado as punishment to a deserving crowd, then those who die were given opportunity to repent. This does not preclude people from dying as a result of natural disaster simply because they happened to be in the road of bad weather. The two are not connected. However, we as limited humans cannot directly tell the difference.

82 posted on 02/23/2009 11:26:04 AM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
Please point out in any of the sacred writings, Old and/or New Testament, where God's plan involved evolution. G'hed.

Please point out where it says that God's plan did NOT involve evolution.

83 posted on 02/23/2009 11:27:22 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

Thank you for the dictionary definition—I never would have thought of that!

However, the dictionary presents man’s definition of chance, not God’s definition. To God, there is no chance. Given that, even the random, chance occurrences that are part of evolutionary theory are all part of God’s plan.


84 posted on 02/23/2009 11:28:29 AM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
Please point out where it says that God's plan did NOT involve evolution.

You must have missed the whole "creation" thing?

Creation involves purpose and design.

85 posted on 02/23/2009 11:28:42 AM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
If God sends a tornado as punishment to a deserving crowd, then those who die were given opportunity to repent. This does not preclude people from dying as a result of natural disaster simply because they happened to be in the road of bad weather. The two are not connected. However, we as limited humans cannot directly tell the difference.

Oh. So some people have a chance to repent but others do not because they, by chance, were in the route of bad weather?

86 posted on 02/23/2009 11:29:03 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
Creation involves purpose and design.

Then you disagree with those that promote ID?

87 posted on 02/23/2009 11:29:55 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
If God sends a tornado as punishment to a deserving crowd, then those who die were given opportunity to repent. This does not preclude people from dying as a result of natural disaster simply because they happened to be in the road of bad weather. The two are not connected. However, we as limited humans cannot directly tell the difference.

If we as limited humans cannot directly tell the difference, how do you know there is a difference?

88 posted on 02/23/2009 11:31:19 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.
However, the dictionary presents man’s definition of chance, not God’s definition. To God, there is no chance. Given that, even the random, chance occurrences that are part of evolutionary theory are all part of God’s plan.

God's definition is ours since He gave us the mind to understand the world around us. He created our rational mind, our logic, our reason. Every definition we conceive has been pre-ordained by God.

You are correct in saying the to God, there is no chance. Simply because we see it as chance does not mean it is so to the Master. Consider this, were we to be able to account for every occurance, every reaction to some action, then there would be no such word as 'random' or 'chance'. God has this ability being Omniscient and Omnipotent. Part of His job description.

89 posted on 02/23/2009 11:33:09 AM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
Then you disagree with those that promote ID?

You are kidding, right? What does the "D" in "ID" stand for?

90 posted on 02/23/2009 11:33:53 AM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
You are kidding, right?

No, I am not. Please respond. Do you agree with ID or not?

91 posted on 02/23/2009 11:35:38 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
If we as limited humans cannot directly tell the difference, how do you know there is a difference?

Excellent question. Those who repent and turn to God, to them, they see the difference. God's purpose is served. Man is redeemed.

Do you see the cross as a symbol of torture and death, or do you see it as a symbol of what God did for you out of love?

92 posted on 02/23/2009 11:35:41 AM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
No, I am not. Please respond. Do you agree with ID or not?

You must be. Intelligent Design is a scientific method that allows for an intelligent designer. What precisely is your question?

93 posted on 02/23/2009 11:37:08 AM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
Consider this, were we to be able to account for every occurance, every reaction to some action, then there would be no such word as 'random' or 'chance'. God has this ability being Omniscient and Omnipotent.

Exactly. Evolution may not be based on randomness or chance and we should not discount it on that basis. We as mere mortals cannot limit God's power.

94 posted on 02/23/2009 11:38:33 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

Why do you keep ducking the question? Are you afraid to take a stand on whether or not ID may be a valid theory?


95 posted on 02/23/2009 11:39:25 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

“...He gave us the mind to understand the world around us. He created our rational mind, our logic, our reason.”

Precisely. We use the mind that God gave us to postulate that evolution is the path that God took to get us here.


96 posted on 02/23/2009 11:39:44 AM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
Intelligent Design is a scientific method that allows for an intelligent designer.

Doesn't ID also say that life first formed in pools of scum and that man evolved from these early life forms over billions of years?

97 posted on 02/23/2009 11:40:32 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
Exactly. Evolution may not be based on randomness or chance and we should not discount it on that basis. We as mere mortals cannot limit God's power.

Then it is not evolution, but design and creation. Evolution dictates the means by which man has emerged as random.

98 posted on 02/23/2009 11:43:06 AM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
Why do you keep ducking the question? Are you afraid to take a stand on whether or not ID may be a valid theory

I am not ducking any question. Give one and I will answer it. Simply asking if I agree with some obscure point that only you know, does not constitute me "ducking".

99 posted on 02/23/2009 11:44:14 AM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
am not ducking any question. Give one and I will answer it. Simply asking if I agree with some obscure point that only you know, does not constitute me "ducking".

I will try again. Is Intelligent Design theory consistent with your viewpoints on man's creation?

100 posted on 02/23/2009 11:45:54 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson