Why the exception for Soshcurity and Medicare? Getting the beneficiaries of those two Ponzi schemes off the voters’ rolls would be of enormous benefit to society.
Electors should be: a male, married to and living with the woman who is the mother of all his children.
Hey, I played by the rules. Rules I didn’t make and rules I don’t care for, but rules none the less. I get both, why should I be punished for the mistakes of others, some long before I was born?
Every payday for the nearly 60 years that I worked money was taken from me without my consent. I would gladly have had that money in my pocket all those years rather than being sucked out before I even saw it, along with many dollars from my employer, and I was taxed on it even though I didn’t have it.
Turns out it wasn’t as great a deal as those who envisioned it thought it would be. For one thing it wasn’t long before it wasn’t what they had envisioned in the first place.
I agree the system stinks, but it’s what was forced on me for a lifetime of work and I played by the rules.
When I originally drafted this list, I included SS and Medicare recipients in the ‘non voting’ public sector. However, it seems to me that it’s not wholly voluntary to take SS and Medicare in today’s US; unlike Food Stamps and all the others. So, I put them back in the ‘voting’ sector.
Of course, my suggestions are just that...suggestions. So, if they serve to get the discussion started, that’s great. Howe they end up will be the consensus of all choosing to participate.
It’s time to take back the country.