Then why does is post articles nearly exclusively from young earth creationist sources like AIG and CRI?
I accept “is post?” questions from darwininsts. They confirm my own theory. “Young earth” is just as absurd as the unproven supernatural creative power of natural selection,and the individual should seriously consider his or her own standing in life, if origins should bother one.
The Darwinist cannot explain the changing of one reproductive system into another, his fossil evidence of the theory isn’t there, and he relies upon minor variations among fruit flies and peppered moths and Heike crabs and finch beaks and thousands of African skull fragments he glues together to present as a “Hominid,” as the editors of National Geographic pull puds at their desks in rapt admiration.
I am not a young earth creationist, but reject Darwinism as 19th century pop-culture balderdash, poppycock, junk science, and one of three venues that have focused the attention of the modern world to flailing punks on MTV and an Orwellian fraud like Barack Obama.