Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LeGrande; DevNet

There is a small amount of information on tumors, not ‘tons’ and no indication that they were “cancer,” so save us the Barbara Streisand.


81 posted on 03/11/2009 7:11:29 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor; DevNet
There is a small amount of information on tumors, not ‘tons’ and no indication that they were “cancer,” so save us the Barbara Streisand.

Well maybe not 'tons', but tumors are by definition cancer. And before you say no that's not true, the only difference between benign and malignant is the rate of growth.

If the point you were trying to make is that cancer is a relatively recent major factor in mortality rates I will agree (primarily because antibiotics and immunizations have been so effective at stopping disease).

82 posted on 03/11/2009 9:30:51 AM PDT by LeGrande (I once heard a smart man say that you canÂ’t reason someone out of something that they didnÂ’t reaso)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

You ignore the actual cancers cells find in some Egyptian mummies.

How do you explain something existing before you claim it could?


87 posted on 03/11/2009 4:47:56 PM PDT by DevNet (What's past is prologue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson