Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 03/13/2009 9:00:48 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2205739/posts



Skip to comments.

China "worried" about US Treasury holdings
AP via Yahoo Business ^ | March 13, 2009 | Joe Mcdonald

Posted on 03/13/2009 8:37:20 AM PDT by NRG1973

China's premier didn't say it in so many words, but the implied warning to Washington was blunt: Don't devalue the dollar through reckless spending.

Premier Wen Jiabao's message is unlikely to be misunderstood at the White House. It is counting on Beijing to help pay for its stimulus package by buying U.S. bonds. China already is Washington's biggest foreign creditor, with an estimated $1 trillion in U.S. government debt. A weaker dollar would erode the value of those assets.

"Of course we are concerned about the safety of our assets. To be honest, I'm a little bit worried," Wen said at a news conference Friday after the closing of China's annual legislative session. "I would like to call on the United States to honor its words, stay a credible nation and ensure the safety of Chinese assets."

The appeal suggested the outlines of Chinese President Hu Jintao's stance when he meets with President Barack Obama at an April 2 summit in London of the Group of 20 major economies on possible remedies for the global crisis.

Wen gave no indication whether Beijing wants changes in U.S. policy. But economists said his comments reflect fears that higher U.S. budget deficits from Washington's $787 billion stimulus package could drive down the dollar and the value of China's Treasury notes.

"China is telling the U.S. to be careful, not to overspend and keep an eye on the dollar," said Kelvin Lau, regional economist at Standard Chartered in Hong Kong. "There are risks that China cannot control, so they're depending on the U.S. to maintain fiscal prudence and keep the dollar reasonably stable."

Analysts estimate China keeps nearly half of its $2 trillion in foreign currency reserves in U.S. Treasuries and notes issued by other government-affiliated agencies.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
I wonder if there's any chance tha the 0bama administration will listen to the Chinese any more than they would listen to American citizens.
1 posted on 03/13/2009 8:37:21 AM PDT by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

Even Communists are worried Obama’s spendthrift ways.


2 posted on 03/13/2009 8:38:36 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

Maybe 0bama will listen to other Communists.


3 posted on 03/13/2009 8:39:47 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

I don’t blame the Chinese for being worried. After four years of Obamanomics US Treasuries could well be worth about as much as Zimbabwe’s.


4 posted on 03/13/2009 8:41:15 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

recently i met an american businessman who said that his

chinese employees saved 50% of the money he paid them,

and they lived on the rest.


5 posted on 03/13/2009 8:41:28 AM PDT by ken21 (the only thing we have to fear is fdr deja vu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973
Wheeeeee!!!!


6 posted on 03/13/2009 8:42:11 AM PDT by mylife ( The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

I can’t say I blame them. I can only blame the Federal Reserve for lowering interest in the early 2000’s. We averted that recession because of that move. It allowed people to buy everthing on credit. There was no there there. China has to spend our money and really the best place was in Treasuries. That may not be so in the present and in the future. They may start spending where there is less risk of default. If that day happens, we will be in some deep $hit.


7 posted on 03/13/2009 8:43:32 AM PDT by vets son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

UH-OH. Little stories like these sometimes pack a big punch. Keep your eye on this-the Chinese are a big part of who “finances” our wild spending government. They may be getting ready to say “NO”.—JM


8 posted on 03/13/2009 8:43:55 AM PDT by Jubal Madison (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jubal Madison

You are echoing my concern when I read this article.


9 posted on 03/13/2009 8:45:08 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

The Chinese action in the South Pacific recently against our Naval ship is connected with this story. The Chinese, I believe, were trying to send a message to Washington: “Don’t devalue the Dollar or else.” China is subtly trying to use the threat of military action to keep Washington in line. If the Dollar tanks and China loses these assets, there will be no incentive for them to remain at peace with us.


10 posted on 03/13/2009 8:50:21 AM PDT by Galena Nevada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

They need to be worried.


11 posted on 03/13/2009 8:50:49 AM PDT by devistate one four (Impatiently waiting for the next tea party! Tet '68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

“To be honest, I’m a little bit worried,” Wen said

Sounds like a no wen situation. Sucks to be you, China.


12 posted on 03/13/2009 8:52:04 AM PDT by pappyone (New to Freep, still working a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Galena Nevada

I’m not worried about a military threat.
They’ll use the finacial one for sure though.


13 posted on 03/13/2009 8:52:48 AM PDT by devistate one four (Impatiently waiting for the next tea party! Tet '68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

The Obama administration has no choice but to listen.

Here’s the way it works people:

If China keeps buying our debt at low yields, Obama gets to spend.

If China stops buying our debt, interest rates will go up.

If China not only stops buying new debt, but starts selling their existing debt (esp. the paper they’ve purchased since the summer of 2008), then interest rates go up very quickly.

If Obama does not want to become Jimmy Carter II, then he has to listen to the PRC, pull in his deficit spending plans and figure out how to grow the US economy at the same time. That’s a pretty tall order just now.

As I’ve said before: We won’t see ‘hyperinflation’ that the gold bugs keep predicting. China, for one, Japan for another, won’t allow it.


14 posted on 03/13/2009 8:53:55 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

Let China use those dollars to buy product from us instead of Treasuries and they wouldn’t have to worry about our devaluing.

The government to government Fleece trade deals exported our jobs so we have unemployment, exported our dollars so we are out of money, exported our factories so we haven’t found a way to recover.

Trade means we buy from you and you buy from us - let’s balance trade so we restore our economy prior to pre Fleece deficit trade deals.


15 posted on 03/13/2009 8:55:39 AM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

“chinese employees saved 50% of the money he paid them,

and they lived on the rest.”

Savings to pay for things the state does not provide are not savings. They are money saved to pay for things the state does not provide.


16 posted on 03/13/2009 8:57:43 AM PDT by Sandreckoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
I don’t blame the Chinese for being worried. After four years of Obamanomics US Treasuries could well be worth about as much as Zimbabwe’s.

It may sound crazy but the Chinese leadership seems to be acting more in the best interests of their people than the 0bama administration is about its people.

17 posted on 03/13/2009 8:58:40 AM PDT by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973

Drudge has a link to a Bloomberg story that says the Chinese are asking for “guarantees.” Here’s a quote from the article:

“China, the U.S. government’s largest creditor, is asking “the U.S. to maintain its good credit, to honor its promises and to guarantee the safety of China’s assets,” Wen said today in Beijing at a press briefing after the annual meeting of the legislature.”

Could they be asking for collateral??? I read and dismissed an article a few weeks ago that hinted at such, but maybe there’s something to it.


18 posted on 03/13/2009 8:58:54 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

They know his policies don’t work.


19 posted on 03/13/2009 9:00:08 AM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson