Less than 2% of the entire population is homosexual, and more than 90% of child molesters are male. Therefore, you'd expect almost all of the victims oh child molestation to be female. Yet nearly 40% are male.
Homosexual males are something like 30 TIMES more likely to be pedophiles, perderasts than normal.
But if that needs to be ignored in order for liberals to feel self-righteous, I guess some kids are going to need to be raped. That's a price liberals seem willing to pay.
If this really is about consenting adults in private, when do the children consent to being brought up in an alternative lifestyle home?
Interesting stats, what are the chances of molestation then if two males “adopt” a male child...?
>> It should hardly come as a surprise that homosexuals (in particular, males) are shockingly more likely to be child molesters than other groups. <<
The gay community and the mainstream community scream that pedophilia is not true homosexuality, even when a man abuses a boy child. But, 82% of Catholic priests involved in the pedophilia were not true pedophiles. They were merely homosexual men having sex with underage, teen-aged boys. This is called “ephibophilia,” since the victims are sexually mature. The studies which are cited which suggested that pedophiles aren’t typically homosexual in their non-abusive relationships only looked at true pedophiles: men raping babies.
Priests having sex with underage girls represented a tiny fraction of the remaining cases.
So nearly all of the sexual abuse was homosexual in nature; the vast majority of it done by “normal” homosexuals.
My take: Sexual abuse and other psychological trauma is the cause of a large portion of homosexuality, albeit less than 100%. Psychologically disturbed people often cannot form normal sexual relations, so there sexual energy is refocused into other sexual practices. One of these is homosexuality.
I think it’s possible that the priesthood was once attractive to sexually dysfunctional men because it offered them the promise of a productive, Godly life outside of marriage. The flaw in that thinking is sexual compulsion doesn’t go away just because you get your holy orders; in fact, celibacy requires excellent sexual health.
On the other hand, I’ve seen statistics showing the rate of sexual abuse is just as high among Protestant clergy, school teachers, and other professions which work with children.
Now, since gay sex isn’t procreative, isn’t there a danger that the sexually dysfunctional may be more inclined to want to adopt? Could the foster family system become a gay thing?