Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Big_Monkey
" Wow. That is no incredibly uninformed and childish,

Whatever...

" We can have reasonable discussion about whether or not the government should have gotten involved in the first place, but contracts (and these were legitimate contracts)"

Produce the contracts! Produce the contracts these worthless morons had with the American taxpayer! Produce them, or your claims are as vacuous and empty.

104 posted on 03/19/2009 1:11:12 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets

It was written in the porkulus bill by Mr. Dodd himself.


108 posted on 03/19/2009 1:17:44 PM PDT by EBH (The world is a balance between good & evil, your next choice will tip the scale.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: spunkets

Show us the proof that the SPECIFIC people who were given these contracts were worthless morons. Prove it or else your claims are vacuous and empty.


109 posted on 03/19/2009 1:19:43 PM PDT by tsmith130 (If I had wanted him to succeed, I would have voted for him. I didn't...so I don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: spunkets
"Produce the contracts! Produce the contracts these worthless morons had with the American taxpayer! Produce them, or your claims are as vacuous and empty.

Are you unhinged? Do you not understand the most fundamental principles of business law and practice? Really, this is business 101.

Edward Liddy, in his sworn testimony to Congress yesterday, described in great detail the terms and conditions of these employment contract. If you like, feel free to Google his testimony. It might also help you to read the entire thread. A little self-eduction could do you wonders.

When a business in purchased, that business assets and liabilities are assumed by the purchaser. The employment contracts for these executives/employees are liabilities. When the US Taxpayer, vis-a-vis the US Congress, to an 80% equity position in AIG, it also took an 80% risk in the liabilities attached to AIG - AKA these employment contracts.

This is not complicated. What the US Congress is doing is clearly unconstitutional and a tremendous danger to our way of life.

114 posted on 03/19/2009 1:21:22 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: spunkets
Under corporate law, the contract is with the corporation, not its shareholders. The U.S. government is a shareholder, not the legal entity known as the corporation.
121 posted on 03/19/2009 1:24:42 PM PDT by keepitreal (Obama brings change: an international crisis (terrorism) within 6 months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson