Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: flintsilver7
especially when they are given to people in the same division of the company that was responsible for the problems

Are you certain this is true? I believe I heard, either last night or this a.m., that the people getting the bonuses were not the people who caused the meltdown at AIG. Those people are gone.

35 posted on 03/19/2009 12:22:30 PM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianLiz

I’m not sure, but I definitely have heard from multiple sources that they were part of the problem. It doesn’t make sense to me, but I do suppose it’s possible.


51 posted on 03/19/2009 12:30:13 PM PDT by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianLiz; flintsilver7
especially when they are given to people in the same division of the company that was responsible for the problems

Are you certain this is true? I believe I heard, either last night or this a.m., that the people getting the bonuses were not the people who caused the meltdown at AIG. Those people are gone.

You are correctLibertarianLiz. These retention bonuses were contractually promised to people asked to stay on and unwind the Financial Products unit. They are trying to manage trillions of dollars and right the sinking ship. The ones who took the ridiculous risks are gone. Management of these products is a very specialized and there are not many around who have the skills to do so. If the folks who received the bonuses walk away (and who can blame them if they do after the venom congress spewed yesterday), AIG may yet fail.

91 posted on 03/19/2009 12:59:48 PM PDT by OrangeDaisy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson