Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

States Look at Tobacco to Balance the Budget
New York Times ^ | March 20, 2009 | Shaila Dewan

Posted on 03/21/2009 5:38:13 AM PDT by reaganaut1

ATLANTA — Mississippi’s tax on cigarettes, at 18 cents a pack the nation’s third-lowest, has not been raised since 1985. Gov. Haley Barbour, a former tobacco lobbyist, has long opposed an increase.

But this year, state lawmakers have gone from giving little thought to a tobacco tax increase to arguing over how much the tax should go up and where the money should go.

And they are not alone. Budget shortfalls are pushing more than 20 states to look to tobacco for revenue, even those that have long been loath to touch cigarette taxes.

In the South, where such taxes have been lower than in the rest of the country, Arkansas has nearly doubled its tax, to $1.15 a pack, and Kentucky’s will double, to 60 cents, on April 1.

Increases are also under consideration in other tobacco-growing states like North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia. With estimated state budget shortfalls nearing $50 billion, opponents of smoking see an opportunity to make headway with the most reluctant lawmakers.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: pufflist; taxes; taxincreases; tobaccotaxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
I'm not a smoker, but I still see the injustice of targeting a small group of people to pay for more government. Obama promising to fund all his new spending only with taxes on the "rich" does the same thing. (Of course, he will be raising taxes on households with income less than $250K with cap and trade.)

Raising cigarette taxes too high encourages black market sales. If the government becomes just a means of robbing Peter to pay Paul, evading taxes is morally justified.

1 posted on 03/21/2009 5:38:13 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Someone said we need 20,000,000 more smokers to pay for that SCHIP BS ...

As a former Smoker, I say to these governments .. Why buy them if I CAN”T SMOKE THEM ANYWHERE??
Stupid Marxist Bast****.


2 posted on 03/21/2009 5:45:33 AM PDT by gwilhelm56 (My 2nd amendment protects my 1st amendment... I carry a GUN because I can't Carry a SOLDIER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Roger that on the black market.

I met two smokers from NY when I was on travel.
When I asked how they could live in NYcity and afford cigarettes, they laughed and said only idiots buy liget smokes from a store.


3 posted on 03/21/2009 5:46:17 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

The higher the cost, the fewer people who will smoke, and the less tax revenue will be collected. And I believe a higher percentage of blacks smoke - and they voted for Nobama at about 95%. Surely they won’t be happy.


4 posted on 03/21/2009 5:47:48 AM PDT by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

They got you covered, taxing leaf tobacco is also in there.

I was at a local quick-stop yesterday, the ruckus being created is worthy of a documentary on voting.


5 posted on 03/21/2009 5:49:11 AM PDT by Tarpon (It's a common fact, one can't be liberal and rational at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
What? This is direct tax on his sheep...and himself...
6 posted on 03/21/2009 5:50:18 AM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
I'm not a smoker, but I still see the injustice of targeting a small group of people to pay for more government.

Above and beyond that, increasing taxes on anything results in less activity in whatever is being taxed. Lots of folks have and will jump on the bandwagon to tax smokers into oblivion, but what happens when less folks smoke because they are priced out of the activity? Those taxes collected from smokers will decline and the balance needed to fund these boondoggles will be shifted to the rest of us. Another example of this was the so-called "luxury tax" on yachts a few years ago. The result was less people buying yachts and tons of folks in the yacht building business going under. Eventually, the tax was repealed, but not before serious damage was done to the yacht industry.

If the government becomes just a means of robbing Peter to pay Paul.....

It already has in ways too numerous to list here.

....evading taxes is morally justified.

Seems like that has already happened too. Daschle, Geithner, et al.....

7 posted on 03/21/2009 5:51:18 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Government is not the solution to the problem. Government IS the problem - Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

This is so stupid. Let’s see. The politicians are raising taxes on a minority that is shrinking everyday. How stupid. People are smoking less and less everyday. Once they bully all smokers to quit...What is next?????


8 posted on 03/21/2009 5:53:29 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

This horse is just about dead. Politicians can’t beat much more out of it in the way of taxes. States, including my own, are thinking about big increases in tobacco taxes on the back of the big Federal increases. I’m a cigar smoker myself but I expect I’ll be giving it up soon. The guy I buy from says the new Federal taxes kick in April 1 (appropriate) and they are extremely complicated and expensive. I don’t know if he’ll still be in the business in a few months.

Here’s the dirty little secret to all these taxes though. They go to fund expansions in programs that will still need funding when tobacco tax revenues nosedive. They’ll just shift the taxes to a different segment of society. Federal programs never die and taxes rarely go down.


9 posted on 03/21/2009 5:59:26 AM PDT by saganite (What would Sully do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Not only is trying to penalize an ever-shrinking pool incredibly stupid, did any of these ass-clowns EVER think to maybe, oh, I don’t know—CUT SPENDING INSTEAD????


10 posted on 03/21/2009 5:59:27 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

As of April 1st the federal tax on loose tobacco is going up by 2200%.

Here in Michigan, Jenny Granholm is concerned about the “breathtaking” drop in tobacco and lottery revenues and is considering using nearly a billion dollars of “stimulus” money to balance the books.

The FDA is taking control of regulating the tobacco industry which will finish them off.

SCHIP funding is designed to fail.


11 posted on 03/21/2009 6:00:07 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“...What is next????? “

In the coming Amerika of ‘everything-not-mandatory-is-forbidden’ in the name of Nationalized Health Care and ‘Nanny Knows Best’, there will be plenty of room in the gulag when they come after your particular ‘guilty pleasure’...


12 posted on 03/21/2009 6:00:53 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (At some point, government has to be the next bubble to burst. (H/T Freeper This_far))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike

I’m guessing that alcohol taxes will be the next big thing. After that, Big Macs.


13 posted on 03/21/2009 6:03:56 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Gov’t at all levels has grown so large that it has to find all sorts of ways to extract more money from its subjects. Just like the Fair Tax argument, people tend to confuse the method of collection with the amount of collection wanted.

Gov’t is just too damned big.


14 posted on 03/21/2009 6:05:48 AM PDT by umgud (I'm really happy I wasn't aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Not just fast food. I think meat will be taxed at a higher rate because cows are on the AGW hit list.


15 posted on 03/21/2009 6:06:25 AM PDT by saganite (What would Sully do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: saganite
Federal programs never die and taxes rarely go down.

The only thing harder to kill than a vampire, is a gov't program.

17 posted on 03/21/2009 6:08:59 AM PDT by umgud (I'm really happy I wasn't aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

There are still LONG lines at the Indian Reservations.. so Drop in tax revenue does not necessarily mean people are quitting... I probably bought a dozen pack of cigarettes over the last 10 years of my smoking...

Screw them ... they wanna be Marxist Crybabies, I REFUSE to support them Financially!!


18 posted on 03/21/2009 6:10:22 AM PDT by gwilhelm56 (My 2nd amendment protects my 1st amendment... I carry a GUN because I can't Carry a SOLDIER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Aroostok Republican

“I say instead legalize marijuana and tax the bleep out of it.”

You know what...”when marijuana is legalized, it would be mostly the zero supporters that would smoke it.” If they are too stoned to give a crap...they would stay away from the poles and we wouldn’t be electing anymore Marxists...You may be on to something — I have never seen a productive stoner, have you.


19 posted on 03/21/2009 6:13:30 AM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Aroostok Republican

I’ve been making the same argument for years, but it falls on deaf ears.

First it would save buckets of money in enforcement and then bring in even more money through taxation. To me treating marijuana in the same manner as alcohol and tobacco (taxes, age restrictions, etc)


20 posted on 03/21/2009 6:14:19 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson