Posted on 03/29/2009 6:02:38 AM PDT by AJ in NYC
As do I. Congress has no authority to redefine terminology concerning birth or citizenship as anything other than the meanings delineated in Law of Nations, § 212 - 215.
Was it spelled ‘Hawaii’ or ‘Hawai’i’ when the state was admitted into the Union?
That’s the only spelling I’m interested in.
Cute cartoon but something tells me if they were to unlock that box and open it they would find it empty.
Golly Gee !!
ANDY MARTIN to the rescue !!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Martin_(U.S._politician)
Let me add to that:
"What could be so secret about a birth certificate that the President of the United States would resort to forgery and create a nonexistent, Certificate of Live Birth to deceive the American public and members of Congress?"
I believe that Barry's Bus is bigger than Bubba's Bus and would roll over the world if it could.
Barry Dunham. White Boy. British citizen.
Section 212:The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. [] The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.
ping and fingers crossed!
To All,I think,in France it is a crime to be aware of a crime and not report it to the authorities.Are there any state or federal laws that may be used in Hawaii to force the issue?
“Accessory before the fact” & “Aiding and abetting” comes closest.
http://criminal.findlaw.com/crimes/a-z/aiding_abetting_accessory.html
A person charged with aiding and abetting or accessory is usually not present when the crime itself is committed, but he or she has knowledge of the crime before or after the fact, and may assist in its commission through advice, actions, or financial support. Depending on the degree of involvement, the offender’s participation in the crime may rise to the level of conspiracy.
Exactly.
Yet since the federal government has decided that IT is the end-all and be-all of Law, neither the Constitution nor the Law of Nations will contain it.....
and the Sheeple still sleep.
I agree with your line of reasoning.
That was interesting, thnx...
That was cool information about their language too. ;)
I agree. Once he becomes a liability to a Democratic Congress majority they will allow SCOTUS to examine his BC and then express mock surprise at what they knew all along
More importantly, beyond embarrassment, will be disclosure of how easily the highest office of our land was hijacked due to the lackadaisical attitude of most whose duty it was to safeguard our constitution.
Temporarily. Bidet needs a Veep. That would be Hillary!...
They tyre of hearing that and will kick you to the kerb...
I like the way you think.
Keithly’s Law: To get press coverage, uncover.
(Elizabeth Keithly ran for governor of California on the Peace and Freedom Party’s ticket. she got zero press coverage until she started campaigning in the nude)...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.