Our last President was King Abdullah's b*tch too. No wonder so many people want to drill ANWR, and no wonder so many politicians are so dead-set against it. King Abdullah can't drink his oil, after all.
Posted on 04/02/2009 8:19:47 AM PDT by rdb3
This is being sterilized. No MSM coverage. A Google search under “Obama bows” turns up no hits. No one is looking this up on Google? I find it hard to believe.
What shows up as news is from Australia and the Kansas City Star.
OBAMA IS KISSING ABULLAH’S HAND OR RING... CAN’T ANYBODY ELSE SEE THAT FROM THIS ANGLE?
Make that “Abdullah.” God, I’m so pissed off.
Mostly bloggers picked it up, examined it and held the subject up in the light for discussion.
I know. You don’t find it odd that the subject “Obama bows” shows no activity or interest on Google?
No, because Google is...Google.
Oops, I should have checked for myself before answering you.
Click on the links below:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&&rls=en&q=obama+%2B+bows&btnG=Search
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&rls=en&q=obama%20%2B%20bows&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn
brings up 14,400 results, earlier this morning is was showing over 120,000 results. Goggle is burying this story
I clicked on the first link in post no. 848:
Quote:
Results 1 - 10 of about 8,570,000 for obama + bows. (0.08 seconds)
I clicked on the second link in post no. 848:
Results 1 – 10 of about 2,018 for obama bows. (0.19 seconds)
My conclusion is that I can find more possible hits in link no. 1 which is a general Google search than in link no. 2 which is a news search.
You’re right - Google is Google. Type in “Obama bows”, too few people know about using terms and +.
Watch how you get hits in the millions for Obama bowls, but nothing for Obama bows. Google displays the number of times a search was initiated on that term, no?
For “Obama bows” they have nothing. No one has searched on this term?
If you have a blog, put a link to one of the articles on your blog; then you will have an archival link.
If not, you can refer back to FR by doing a title search using a minimal word phrase (ie “Obama bows).
So you lament this latest round of Federalism by pining for the romantic movie version of rampant Federalism?
No wonder this country is so screwed up.
I meant results, not searches, sorry.
No. I find enough hits here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2220709/posts?page=848#848
I could care less what Google does or does not do, because my news source is NOT Google.
I hope that helps somewhat.
Thank you so much for all of this.
Our last President was King Abdullah's b*tch too. No wonder so many people want to drill ANWR, and no wonder so many politicians are so dead-set against it. King Abdullah can't drink his oil, after all.
Where, in your rush to moral relativism, is your photo of President Bush in a position of subjugation?
Likewise, was Obama’s bow reciprocated?
No. It was not. Not even, with so much as a nod.
Obama’s was an act of supplication.
I am torn by this.
I refer to him as a radical racist, Marxist and socialist.
I thought I would have to add idiot amateur to that, but that implies he doesn’t realize the negative import of the things he is doing, such as this bow.
I have come to the conclusion he knows quite well.
Your second “photo” - the alleged kissyface. Is obviously a crude photoshop. Democrat propaganda.
Obama’s (deep, and unreturned) bow to the Saudi King, was not a photoshop. It was the act of an inferior, in the presence of their superior.
Look at the photo - the Asian leaders looking on, were flabbergasted at what was happening.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.