"I told you what a theory is and yet you continue to misunderstand.'
No, you told me what YOU think a theory is. And you also told me and everyone else that you think a THEORY , namely TTOE, is a science.
So we have you stating a mathematical formula as being a theory, and a theory as being science.
And you call me blind?
As I stated earlier, good thing you are not a "scientist", more specifically, your "tribe" doesn't think and rely on you being a scientist, or else they would all still be clubbing animals to death and eating them raw.
Because it is. He's correct, you're not.
So we have you stating a mathematical formula as being a theory, and a theory as being science.
And you call me blind?
Well, when the shoe fits... On the one hand, we have freedumb2003, whose definition of theory in a scientific context matches the one used by the scientific community, who would probably be in a position to know it and get it right, on the other hand we have you and your own personal definition of it, which is at odds with how science actually uses the term, not to mention that you're the guy who can't even get it right when you try to make an objective, verifiable claim like the degree of DNA similarity between snakes/monkeys/humans...
Yeah, I'd say that freedom2003 has you pegged.
And since you're so far being oddly silent on my challenge that you support or retract your snakes/monkeys/human DNA claim, indications are that there are greater obstacles between you and accuracy than merely being blind to it.
Can someone please explain to my why the folks who most claim to be the righteous ones on this topic have are so fond of false witness?