There is only one issue that I agree with the homosexuals on and that is that closeted slime like Mark Foley and Larry Craig have no business in the Republican Party. They should have been upfront about their perverted nature and not deceived voters. If someone has the courage to leave the homosexual lifestyle, then I can respect that. But if they are secretly living as a homo, but pretending to be family-friendly, then I want them exposed.
To: DesertRenegade
What silly, trivial people.
2 posted on
04/28/2009 11:49:32 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: DesertRenegade
They couldn’t be up front about it. They hate that part of themselves. If they could cut it out with a knife, they likely would. They were self hating, which might have been the reason why they championed some of the legislation they did.
3 posted on
04/28/2009 11:51:14 AM PDT by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: DesertRenegade
Was Lindsay Graham interviewed?
To: DesertRenegade
If you believe the information that come to light in the Boy’s Town scandal of the late 80’s, then it is possible that the entire Republican leadership is riddled with homosexuals and pedophiles.
To: DesertRenegade
“good health care policy is in the works,”
If that ‘good’ health care becomes policy I wonder if history will show it was ‘good’ to gays dieing of AIDs. Will other non-PC classes be denied care in preference for others deemed worthy or ??? I wonder whether gays will find theyre on their own?
17 posted on
04/28/2009 12:14:04 PM PDT by
556x45
To: DesertRenegade
This is two year old stuff. Personally I don't care if a person is a swish! I don't care if he is a practicing swish and I don't see why he should advertise it. Maybe the person is making and attempt to change and is not being successful. If he is not molesting minors and he's making an attempt to stay in the closet then I don't have a problem with him. If he is voting right on everything what's the problem. Only republicans are held to these standards.
18 posted on
04/28/2009 12:15:29 PM PDT by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
To: DesertRenegade
I probably am alone and naive on this, but I am not convinced Larry Craig is guilty or even gay. I am not saying he is not, just there is only the flimsiest evidence on which to base these accusations. He tapped his foot in a men's bathroom. I have never seen such a railroading of justice since the Duke rape accusations. Does no one even consider the possibility that a partisan Democrat airport security guard, (Think Rush Limbaugh) recognized Craig going into the bathroom and decided to arrest him. For what? Tapping his foot? Isn't it possible that Craig was so embarrassed and ashamed that he just did what he had to do to make it go away? I could be wrong, but based on what I have seen this is a hit job to me.
20 posted on
04/28/2009 12:22:13 PM PDT by
sportutegrl
(If liberals could do math, they would be conservatives.)
To: DesertRenegade
To begin with, I should be upset there's a movie dedicated to this. To out someone is a bit of a faux pas, and this movie probably doesn't help the queer cause. At the same time, it kind of makes the director of the film, Kirby Dick, look like the same four-letter word that is also his last name. I thought the author wrote that important Americans don't wear tiaras?
Plus, he doen't seem to be aware that Miss California finished 2nd.
To: DesertRenegade
Larry Craig, too, has advocated legislative action that hinders his own sexual adventures
I wonder about this. Did he advocate legislation against homosexual behavior?
29 posted on
04/28/2009 4:45:22 PM PDT by
murdoog
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson