Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A look at potential Obama nominees to high court (Includes MA Governor Deval Patrick!)
New York Newsday / The Associated Press ^ | April 30, 2009

Posted on 04/30/2009 9:11:41 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Among the people President Barack Obama is likely to consider to replace Justice David Souter:

— U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan, a former Harvard University law professor.

— Judge Ruben Castillo of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

— Pam Karlan, a law professor at Stanford University.

— Judge Margaret McKeown of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; banglist; moralabsolutes; obama; prolife; scotus; souter; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan - with her vast courtroom experience - she’ll be a shoe in. /s


21 posted on 04/30/2009 10:14:57 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Any Muslim federal judges out there ?


22 posted on 04/30/2009 10:26:27 PM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
Oh, please, please, take Deval Patrick out of MA!

I would like to see him out of here too...but as a result of a kick in the pants by the voters next year. Even the moonbats have stopped chanting "Yes We Can". Patrick has a sad 33% approval rating right now...I'm even wondering if he'll survive the primary!

He would be the worst kind of Supreme Court justice. It would be straight line ideology...he would base every vote on political correctness. He wouldn't even need a law clerk. Cases? Constitution? No, he'd feeeeel his vote.
23 posted on 04/30/2009 10:51:44 PM PDT by LostInBayport (When more than 98% of the Republicans on Capitol Hill vote against a bill, it is not bipartisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport

What, no Harriet Meyers on the list?

My bet is Medea Benjamin.


24 posted on 04/30/2009 11:52:14 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (The time has come to tell the salmon-eating international busybodies to mind their own business.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Kim Wardlaw would be an excellent choice. If O’s going with a woman, hope he picks her. Diane Wood and Sonia Sotomayor are not so excellent but still very good choices. Wood is way preferable to Sotomayor though. I think we can probably rule out the politicians and law profs for this seat.
25 posted on 05/01/2009 3:47:55 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Bookmark
26 posted on 05/01/2009 4:02:51 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Are any of these candidates homosexuals?

Seeing as there is sort of an affirmative action mentality on the SC, it might be argued that Souter has the “gay” seat. Oh, wait, he’s not an open homosexual.

Just a “confirmed bachelor.” Ahem.


27 posted on 05/01/2009 4:43:06 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armymarinemom

Just so long as WE don’t have to fool with him anymore! He’s so incompetent, he probably wouldn’t be the instigator of too much on the Supremes.


28 posted on 05/01/2009 6:34:22 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I guess it depends on who has the most money to spend on the seat...

29 posted on 05/01/2009 6:35:59 AM PDT by ~Vor~ (A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport
He would be the worst kind of Supreme Court justice. It would be straight line ideology...he would base every vote on political correctness.

Then he'd be no different than any other nominee put forth by That One, but he'd be a lot less smart, or competent.

30 posted on 05/01/2009 6:36:21 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

He should be keelhauled..just on general principles..


31 posted on 05/01/2009 10:33:15 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Sotomayor will be the next Justice on the SCOTUS.

She would be ideal for Obama. She gives a bigger middle finger to the constitution than Ginsburg.

32 posted on 05/01/2009 1:13:49 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Obama's multi- trillion dollar agenda would be a "man caused disaster")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson