Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ira_Louvin

[[This is listed under “Arguments we think creationist should not use”]]

There’s NO reason to avoid it- The second law PREVENTS evolution- if you care to find out how, lemme know- neither friction nor digestion nor any of those examples eve3n come close to representign hte problems evolution faces concernign hte law as you’;ll find out if you wish to continue this- I warned you that it makes the position that evolution could have escaped the law of entropy look silly, but if you wish to continue- lemme know


181 posted on 05/11/2009 8:08:05 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop

You should discuss this with your fellow creationist over at Creation Ministries International. They are the ones advising against using that argument.

If you noticed I copied and pasted the text directly from their site with a link.

BTW exactly how many peer-reviewed papers have you had published?


183 posted on 05/11/2009 8:13:22 PM PDT by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson