Posted on 05/08/2009 10:13:24 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Boy this sure is going to make family reunions complex.
Yeah, but the liberals will have a solution. Just marry the entire family to one another as a group. Then, everyone is your "spouse", no more worries about whether someone's a sister or a cousin or an aunt.
Interestingly, I think a lot of the homosexuals are going to find a way to OPPOSE this. As we know, the movement for “gay marriage” has nothing to do with “marriage” and everything to do with special rights for homosexuals and advancing the homosexual agenda. Polyamory takes the spotlight off them.
And I specifically recall the 'gay leaders' saying back then that they'd "Never Push For Gay Marriage". They 'only wanted' the government out of the bedroom. But that sure didn't last long, and now this abomination.
We're in the fast lane to Hell.
As usual, the rest of the country is several years behind Oregon. I don’t have a link to the Portland newspaper article, but I saved a copy in my Oregon Weird file.
“Priest reassigned after blessing three-person relationship
10/28/02”
Exactly. ITA. Fiscal liberalism/socialism is the inevitable consequence of social liberalism.
They just don’t give up, folks.
That’s why you have to deny them from the start.
My state’s constitution Article 21, sec 1:
Sec. 1. [Religious toleration; polygamy.]
Perfect toleration of religious sentiment shall be secured, and no inhabitant of this state shall ever be molested in person or property on account of his or her mode of religious worship. Polygamous or plural marriages and polygamous cohabitation are forever prohibited.
Did you hear about the woman who “married” the Berlin Wall?
This thread discusses it-
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2232313/posts
Yes, who’s your daddy isn’t a funny phrase, but a serious inquiry.
How is it that we have thousands and thousands of years of human history on our side, hundreds of failed and successful civilizations that act as laboratories for what works, and the greatest set of governing principles ever instituted among men, yet we are fighting for our very survival?
I remember when Rosanne Barr and then husband, Tom did this with some woman, it worked out great for them. Oh, wait no, no it didn’t.
I just can’t live in that world, it’s time for a change.
Never. It won’t.
Did you think that up yourself? It makes too much sense! /sarc
I have been predicting this for some time. If gay marriage is allowed, there is no logical reason to prevent multiple partners.
It's been around a lot longer than you realize.
And here's a clue. These people are all consenting adults so it's really none of anyones business how they conduct their love lives.
L
While that may be arguably true, how they conduct their legal lives IS everybodys business.
Really? So you'd deny them the Right of Contract? You'd deny them the Right to decide who gets their assets after their deaths? You'd deny them the right to decide who gets to visit them in the hospital? You'd deny them the Right to Power of Attorney?
This behavior, while you may find it abhorrent, doesn't harm you in the least.
It is quite simply none of your business.
L
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.