Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: horse_doc
I dunno - because PETER WAS MARRIED, maybe? As well as some of the other apostles?

We know that Peter was married at one time; Scripture never mentions his wife by name, and we know that Peter and the Apostles gave up everything; including a wife if they were married, to follow Christ.

"Then Peter answering, said to him: Behold we have left all things, and have followed thee: what therefore shall we have? And Jesus said to them: Amen, I say to you, that you, who have followed me, in the regeneration, when the Son of man shall sit on the seat of his majesty, you also shall sit on twelve seats judging the twelve tribes of Israel. And every one that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall possess life everlasting." Matthew 19:27-30 (emphasis added for your edification)

"Then Peter said: Behold, we have left all things, and have followed thee. Who said to them: Amen, I say to you, there is no man that hath left house, or parents, or brethren, or wife, or children, for the kingdom of God's sake, Who shall not receive much more in this present time, and in the world to come life everlasting." Luke 18:28-30 (emphasis added for your edification)

Since you seem intent on adding to Scripture that which is not there, I sugggest you familiarize yourself with the writings of Clement of Alexandria contained in "The Stromata"; Book VII, Chapter XI:

'They say, accordingly, that the blessed Peter, on seeing his wife led to death, rejoiced on account of her call and conveyance home, and called very encouragingly and comfortingly, addressing her by name, "Remember thou the Lord." Such was the marriage of the blessed and their perfect disposition towards those dearest to them.

Thus also the apostle says, "that he who marries should be as though he married not," and deem his marriage free of inordinate affection, and inseparable from love to the Lord; to which the true husband exhorted his wife to cling on her departure out of this life to the Lord.' (emphasis added for your edification)

You might also reflect that Paul was probably married at some point as well, since he had been a member of the Sanhedrin.

I suggest you familiarize yourself with St. Paul's writings in 1 Corinthians.

"For I would that all men were even as myself: but every one hath his proper gift from God; one after this manner, and another after that. But I say to the unmarried, and to the widows: It is good for them if they so continue, even as I." 1 Corinthians 7:7-8 (emphasis added for your edification)

"But I would have you to be without solicitude. He that is without a wife, is solicitous for the things that belong to the Lord, how he may please God. But he that is with a wife, is solicitous for the things of the world, how he may please his wife: and he is divided. And the unmarried woman and the virgin thinketh on the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit. But she that is married thinketh on the things of the world, how she may please her husband. And this I speak for your profit: not to cast a snare upon you; but for that which is decent, and which may give you power to attend upon the Lord, without impediment." 1 Corinthians 7:32-35 (emphasis added for your edification)

and the guy should have resigned before taking a wife.

On that we agree.

But if being married was o.k. for Peter, then it is o.k. for all those "Bible-believing Protestants", who apparently know the scriptures better than you do.

Obviously not.

58 posted on 05/09/2009 9:18:30 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: A.A. Cunningham
1 Corinthians 9:5

"Do we have no right to take along a believing wife, as do also the other apostles, the brothers of the Lord, and Cephas?"

Peter and the apostles were married. They had the right to take their wives with them. PETER DID SO.

You cannot read it any other way.

Your appeal to Luke is bizarre -Luke was saying that God comes first, not that you have to have no parents, no children, or no wife.

It is what it is - otherwise, you need to cut 1 Corinthians 9:5 out of your Bible.
60 posted on 05/09/2009 9:29:34 AM PDT by horse_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson