To: buccaneer81
Maybe future spacecraft will sit on top of the ice covered fuel tanks instead of being put in harms way where the ice can do damage. Am I the only person that thinks about this?
105 posted on
05/13/2009 5:31:18 AM PDT by
DocRock
(All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
To: DocRock
Maybe future spacecraft will sit on top of the ice covered fuel tanks instead of being put in harms way where the ice can do damage. Am I the only person that thinks about this? NOVA on PBS last night was on the shuttle disasters and they said that the shuttle replacement design is basically what you are thinking. A cone on top the booster like the old days. This makes sense. Also crews on separate rocket from payload. Again makes sense. Sometimes you don't need a crew. Sometimes you don't need a huge payload bay.
Anybody got info on the shuttle replacement design Pres. Bush approved in 2004?
111 posted on
05/13/2009 6:27:34 AM PDT by
McGruff
(Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency - Barack Obama)
To: DocRock
That is how Orion works. You’re not the only “genius”. :rolleyes:
114 posted on
05/13/2009 8:41:12 AM PDT by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson