Now phony pictures can be “leaked” with no attribution, and Obama can claim plausible deniability.
The Boston Globe once published front-page “torture” pictures that turned out to be from a homosexual BDSM movie or the like.
Nobody will be able to tell, in the coming flood of images, which are real and which are not.
This explains Obama’s apparent flip-flop on the issue, he figured a way to do even more harm in a way that won’t be his fault, it’ll all be above his pay grade.
There was also a British newspaper that had some staged photos they ran. A genuine soldier posed for “abuse” photos with real military equipment (that was not deployed) and urinated on a supposed prisoner.
Again, my questions about those who participated in these deeds are there because there ARE people who’ve fragged our side (Sgt. Akbar with a grenade attack in 2003 and others) as well as this British traitor and the editor.
We see how the Palestinians use the media war to shape public opinion (staged photo ops, phony victims, photoshopped “damage”).
Exposure and public prosecution is the way to put this down.
And why doesn’t anyone in the world ever consider the horrible deeds committed by Michael Moore’s so-called “freedom fighters” in Iraq?
For propaganda purposes, nobody will care, whether they could tell or not.