Why don’t you creationist bozos give your own seriously flawed theory the same critique that most real scientists give their own pet theories. Bounce it against the data and the facts.
[[Why don’t you creationist bozos]]
wow- you need more bran in your diet
We do. That is one of the reasons why the HMS Creation is standing tall, and the HMS Beagle is sinking. The real “bozos” are those who believe that random processes and survival produce super-sophisticated bio-nano machines that merely give the “appearance” of being designed for a purpose. Who knew blind materialist processes could be such masters of illusion!
Let’s face it, the Temple of Darwin has lost its “tree of life”, has lost it’s prediction of “junk” DNA, has lost it’s phylogenetic predictions, is losing uniformitarianism in favor of catastrophism, and let’s not forget that its fortunes have not gotten any better (indeed, they have gotten far worse) in the other areas creation scientists have traditionally pointed to, such as the fossil record, cell complexity, etc, etc.
But don’t worry, the HMS Creation stands ready to rescue you when the call goes out from the HMS Beagle to abandon ship!
Right on, NR, and we can use this "Ida" story as a model for our approach.
“Why don’t you creationist bozos give your own seriously flawed theory the same critique that most real scientists give their own pet theories. Bounce it against the data and the facts.”
Bounce this;
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2255759/posts