A much more "surgical" approach, an extremely pinpoint mission, resulting in the deaths of maybe 20-50 select North Koreans, might be all that it takes, only if a) it can be done in the first place; b) the alternative/aftermath is something we can both live with and deal with and we could manage any blowback.
Few options. That's one of them though. You can use a shotgun approach. Or you can use a rifle approach. Who really knows what is best. Also is that assured is that appeasement itself is a dead end street and only has value for so long.
"A much more "surgical" approach, an extremely pinpoint mission, resulting in the deaths of maybe 20-50 select North Koreans, might be all that it takes, only if a) it can be done in the first place; b) the alternative/aftermath is something we can both live with and deal with and we could manage any blowback. Few options. That's one of them though. You can use a shotgun approach. Or you can use a rifle approach. Who really knows what is best. Also is that assured is that appeasement itself is a dead end street and only has value for so long."
I really don't get what you're saying. I have read too many times about the massive NK artillary pointed at Seoul.
How can a few snipers take out the NK? Please explain. Good nite.