Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Chooses Sotomayor for Court
New York Times ^ | May 26, 2009 | Jeff Zeleny

Posted on 05/26/2009 5:44:29 AM PDT by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: section9

“That’s good. Mean’s a great court fight!”

I can’t see our lily-livered GOP senators putting up much of a fight.


21 posted on 05/26/2009 5:55:24 AM PDT by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
. . . and only the third female justice in the history of the Supreme Court.

It is going to take a long time for the women to catch up.

22 posted on 05/26/2009 5:56:27 AM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1; P-Marlowe; Dr. Eckleburg; Frumanchu; Corin Stormhands; enat; Gamecock; Lancey Howard; ..

Sotomayor is an absolute liberal/socialist idealogue.

America gets what it voted for, and this undeniably underscores the betrayal of conservatism by the Rino loser non-campaign run by the elite last November.

The announcement by the Treasury that a CRISIS had to be fixed in DAYS has turned out to be a huge lie. That money STILL isn’t spent.

That means that a republican was intentionally derailed by someone on his own side.

They wanted an Obama win, and SCOTUS was one of the major reasons they wanted it.

Huge Betrayal!


23 posted on 05/26/2009 5:56:45 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain, Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out
“Whatever the current “verdict” on Sotomayor is, I guarantee we will be cursing her name in the future. She will be a leftist activist. No good can come out of this illegal “president”, even by accident.”

Elections Have Consequences, and we will feel this one for years and years.

24 posted on 05/26/2009 5:56:59 AM PDT by Nokia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

25 posted on 05/26/2009 5:57:52 AM PDT by Lizavetta (Politicians: When they're not lying, they're stealing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

Guilty!


26 posted on 05/26/2009 5:58:29 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Wow it only took twenty minutes for the news media to shelve her liberal record and talk up the “rags to riches story” I guess if we can get an American Idol president why not glamorize his supreme court picks.
Expect a tv movie starring JLO sometime next year.
27 posted on 05/26/2009 5:59:46 AM PDT by redk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redk
Sounds like she will be the most liberal judge on the court and she thinks she makes the laws.

Clarence Thomas is the ONLY Judge who doesn't think they make the laws.

All of the Judges are legal postivists and think law is what THEY say it is.

28 posted on 05/26/2009 6:00:12 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

when you read the media try to play her as a centrist or have nothing negative to say about her, or try to confince the republicans about the dangers of oppose her because she’s hispanic, as if opposing her will make hispanic angry.... then you know she an activist


29 posted on 05/26/2009 6:01:02 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus
I'm a little surprised he didn't pick Diane Wood. Soto isn't well like even among Democrats, she's described as something of a megalomaniac.

Yes, but she's an Hispanic megalomaniac. That's all that counts.

30 posted on 05/26/2009 6:02:15 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: redk
Fox and friends got the same talking points.....sounds like they're fully in her court (no pun intended!!)

We are hosed.

31 posted on 05/26/2009 6:02:46 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita
Soooooo, which Republicans will affirmatively confirm this woman?

About half would be my prediction.

32 posted on 05/26/2009 6:03:48 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
Yeah as soon as they got Geraldo on the phone I turned it off.
33 posted on 05/26/2009 6:04:25 AM PDT by redk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The question is, will the GOP fight her nomination or cave in front of this feel good story of the “first Hispanic woman to sit on the Supreme Court”?


34 posted on 05/26/2009 6:05:12 AM PDT by Nokia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monocle
Tax evasion is a plus for potential nominees in the view of most Democrats.

On the plus side, if Obama keeps nominating the same kind of people then the back taxes they're forced to pay may almost cover the cost of his health care plans.

35 posted on 05/26/2009 6:05:33 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

0bozo could have done a lot worse, imho.

Fox Business Channel just mentioned an opinion recently posted on a legal site, describing Sotomayor as having pro-corporate tendencies.

She’s originally a Bush-41 appointee.


36 posted on 05/26/2009 6:05:40 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Got Tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

i hope ppl aren’t using wiki as their research material ONLY. The left will be ready to write glowing reviews about her there


37 posted on 05/26/2009 6:06:15 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Early announcement of a controversial selection...What is going on behind the scenes in other arenas that Zer0 needs to use this.

Every news channel is now locked on this story.

Watch the smoke and mirrors...something else bad is afoot!

38 posted on 05/26/2009 6:06:33 AM PDT by IrishPennant (Obama: Succeeding Where Bin Laden Failed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Here’s what you’ll hear the next several days to provide cover for her leftwing record:

A Bush 41 appointment.

A Bush 41 appointment.

A Bush 41 appointment.

A Bush 41 appointment.

A Bush 41 appointment.


39 posted on 05/26/2009 6:09:30 AM PDT by nhwingut ( Don't Blame Me. I Voted For Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nokia

THe dems have the WH and the ability to appoint anyone they please.

Fighting it is futile in my opinion. Why would they do it?


40 posted on 05/26/2009 6:10:04 AM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson