Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VID: Schumer To GOP: Oppose Sotomayor At Your Peril
Real Clear Politics ^ | 05/26/2009 | Real Clear Politics

Posted on 05/26/2009 10:41:50 AM PDT by politicalhub

Sen. Chuck Schumer called Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor a "moderate" and added President Obama did not choose a "far-out liberal." Schumer said it would be hard for a member of either party to oppose her confirmation and warned Republicans to oppose her at their peril.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhoscotus; chuckschumer; intimidation; liberal; schumer; soniasotomayor; sotomayor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 05/26/2009 10:41:51 AM PDT by politicalhub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: politicalhub

Did he jump in front of a camera to spew his words of wisdom?


2 posted on 05/26/2009 10:43:30 AM PDT by b4its2late (There is always one more imbecile than you counted on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalhub

O STHU


3 posted on 05/26/2009 10:43:31 AM PDT by MES401067 (Lenin called them "useful idiots" I for one have no use for them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalhub

Schumer thinks a racist kook is a moderate. So what must that make him?

How many times did this moderate kook judge get overturned?


4 posted on 05/26/2009 10:43:54 AM PDT by Tarpon (You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalhub

But it was ok for you and Ted to link Sam Alito with a racist article that he neither wrote nor read, eh Chucky?


5 posted on 05/26/2009 10:44:30 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalhub

Bite me Schumer


6 posted on 05/26/2009 10:44:33 AM PDT by webschooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalhub

I think every Democrat and Republican who votes for her should be thrown out of office and never considered for any office ever again.


7 posted on 05/26/2009 10:45:01 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The box is broke. You don't have any choice now but to think outside of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon
How many times did this moderate kook judge get overturned?

All four of her opinions were overturned.

8 posted on 05/26/2009 10:45:06 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: politicalhub

Go back to sleep Schumer!


9 posted on 05/26/2009 10:45:17 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalhub

If the Republicans have any backbone left, this threat from the reprehensible dirtbag Schemer should make it stand right up straight.

Schemer is the veangeful little pipsqueak who has gangster friends standing behind him while he threatens the clean cut hero that has everything he wishes he had, starting with real manhood.


10 posted on 05/26/2009 10:45:32 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalhub

It amazes me how these liberals use lies, deceit, manipulation, and propaganda as part of their daily life. It really amazes me how others fall for it.


11 posted on 05/26/2009 10:46:37 AM PDT by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalhub
Already with the threats, Chuckles???


12 posted on 05/26/2009 10:46:43 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (FR. ....Monthly Donors Wanted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalhub

STFU Schumer. Republicans had better grow a spine and oppose this racist judge.


13 posted on 05/26/2009 10:47:22 AM PDT by Long Island Pete (Stupidity is in the DNA of liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
She is quite the Constitutional deep thinker isn't she. The goal is to use race baiting and identity politics to get this anti-Constitutional kook on the court. This may prove to be their undoing, because the other justices, even the liberal ones, still take the law seriously, as I watch her giggling on TV.

By the way, the liberals secret phrase for this kooks brand of jurisprudence is "legal realism" -- So says a lawyer friend who emailed me.

14 posted on 05/26/2009 10:50:06 AM PDT by Tarpon (You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: politicalhub

Yeah, what exactly would Republicans have to lose by opposing her?

Get a spine. Stand on your principles and make your case without falling into liberal traps. This is a GOLDEN opportunity, if it is handled correctly.


16 posted on 05/26/2009 10:51:02 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Mr. Bernanke, have you started working on your book about the second GREATER depression?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalhub
Everyone thinks I'm a pile of crap!....
17 posted on 05/26/2009 10:51:47 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalhub
So, Chuckie - if she's a MODERATE, then why whould you think the GOP would necessarily oppose her, hmmm? (Mark Levin voice: Because she's NOT a moderate, dummy!"
18 posted on 05/26/2009 10:52:09 AM PDT by FrdmLvr (1`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalhub

That dill hole just said that her life story would be important whether she was “black, white, from one country or another.”

Our Country is being run by buffoons.


19 posted on 05/26/2009 10:52:38 AM PDT by stentorian conservative (I'm tired of being Johnny B. Goode and I'm gonna start being Johnny Reb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Exactly, ask what amendment or writing she used to support her decision and how she got to where she did.

Show her decison making process did not include the constitution, but her feelings.

Are we a nation governed by feelings or laws, if feelings everyone should be ablt to do whatever the feel like. There is no need for any law at that point.


20 posted on 05/26/2009 10:54:30 AM PDT by pcpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson