Posted on 05/28/2009 5:10:40 AM PDT by libstripper
In initial reviews of Sotomayors court record, a trend emerges: many of her questionable court decisions have been made per curiam, or, as part of an unsigned decision made by a group of judges, while the decisions she signs her name to are relatively unremarkable.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
“Sotomayor’s Court Record: Lame or Controversial?”
Both.
Then rely on George Soros and Billy Ayers to to propell you forward, until you are completley in over your head
Everyone expected Chief Justice Warren to be a conservative because he had been the Republican Governor of California. They expected Souter to be conservative, Lord knows why... wouldn’t it be marvelous if Sotomayor was just the opposite and got on court as a liberal and turned out to be CONSERVATIVE?
You you can waterboard me now to bring me back to reality. But it would be lovely to see that shoe on the other foot for once in a lifetime.
¡Racista!
The judicial equivalent of voting “present”, perhaps?
Sotomayor is clearly NOT qualified for the Federal Bench, in any capacity.
Very much, especially when, in Illinois, a "present" vote was the equivalent of a "no" vote.
Equally important, it looks tome like this shows she has a definite lack of self-confidence in the quality of her own reasoning and writing. Appellate judges who are good legal scholars usually glory in writing opinions to show off their erudition, something she is obviously very much reluctant to do, especially as shown in the New Haven discrimination case.
Dump her ASAP!
Oh, there are a LOT more than three.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.